2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of the AP abdomen projection for larger patient body thicknesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that visual IQ (VGA method) was increased at low tube potentials for both average and obese size patients. The result from our study is also comparable with Moore et al 15 Our study's findings are comparable with those of Alzyoud and colleagues, 24 Gatt et al, 25 Kawashima and colleagues 26 and Moore et al 28 despite the fact that the techniques, IQ types, phantom types and thicknesses and imaging protocols differed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They found that visual IQ (VGA method) was increased at low tube potentials for both average and obese size patients. The result from our study is also comparable with Moore et al 15 Our study's findings are comparable with those of Alzyoud and colleagues, 24 Gatt et al, 25 Kawashima and colleagues 26 and Moore et al 28 despite the fact that the techniques, IQ types, phantom types and thicknesses and imaging protocols differed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Lower tube potential values (70 kVp) were found to have the highest IQ and the lowest IQ was found at 110 kVp, still delivering acceptable images for diagnosis. These findings were concurred in studies by Gatt et al 25 and Kawashima and colleagues. 26 Gatt et al 25 compared the IQ and radiation dose (DAP values) for different body part thicknesses when undertaking a posteroanterior (PA) abdomen X-ray examination, IQ was assessed both visually (VGA method) and physically (SNR and CNR).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For noise measurements, the noise (standard deviation “ σ ”) was calculated using ImageJ software. SNR and CNR were calculated using the following [ 23 ]: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%