2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11694-020-00471-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of microwave effect on bioactives contents and colour attributes of aqueous green tea extracts by central composite design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…@Growth rate improvement of salmonella enterica in thyme. Carotenoids improvements from thyme and rosemary Munekata et al ( 2020 ) Citrus peels Maceration and ultrasound-assisted extraction Acetone (1:3), 30 min, 37 °C 21.99 Ultrasound-assisted extraction turned out to be an ideal technique in terms of yield, total phenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activity Saini et al ( 2019 ) Green tea Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) 120,360,600 W 1,3,5 min 116.58 Optimum conditions were 350.65 W power, 5 min irradiation time Taşkın and Aksoylu Özbek ( 2020 ) Sea buckthorn bush Conventional extraction vs microwave-assisted extraction Microwave extraction (MAE): 400 W, 20–100 °C, 15 min Conventional: 8000 rpm, 5 min Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE): 1147 Conventional: 741 MAE turned out to be more preferred extraction method as compared to conventional for determining polyphenolic content antioxidant activity of the bush food Périno-Issartier et al ( 2011 ) Carrot juice Microwave-assisted extraction 165 W, 9.39 min extraction time, 8.06:1 g/g oil to waste ratio 215 Enriched flaxseed oil used in carrot juice was in good quality, high in phenolic content and antioxidant activity (70% inhibition) Elik et al ( 2020 ) Propolis Maceration, microwave-assisted extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction Maceration: 24 h, 250 rpm, room temperature ultrasound extraction: 20 kHz, 15 min microwave extraction: 140 W, 1 min 185–504 Ultrasound-assisted extraction proved as a much efficient technique for isolation of polyphenolics extraction efficiency and flavonol content. Sample preparation of propolis played a critical role in obtaining the results Oroian et al ( 2019 ) Carob bark …”
Section: Extraction Methods Of Polyphenolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…@Growth rate improvement of salmonella enterica in thyme. Carotenoids improvements from thyme and rosemary Munekata et al ( 2020 ) Citrus peels Maceration and ultrasound-assisted extraction Acetone (1:3), 30 min, 37 °C 21.99 Ultrasound-assisted extraction turned out to be an ideal technique in terms of yield, total phenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activity Saini et al ( 2019 ) Green tea Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) 120,360,600 W 1,3,5 min 116.58 Optimum conditions were 350.65 W power, 5 min irradiation time Taşkın and Aksoylu Özbek ( 2020 ) Sea buckthorn bush Conventional extraction vs microwave-assisted extraction Microwave extraction (MAE): 400 W, 20–100 °C, 15 min Conventional: 8000 rpm, 5 min Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE): 1147 Conventional: 741 MAE turned out to be more preferred extraction method as compared to conventional for determining polyphenolic content antioxidant activity of the bush food Périno-Issartier et al ( 2011 ) Carrot juice Microwave-assisted extraction 165 W, 9.39 min extraction time, 8.06:1 g/g oil to waste ratio 215 Enriched flaxseed oil used in carrot juice was in good quality, high in phenolic content and antioxidant activity (70% inhibition) Elik et al ( 2020 ) Propolis Maceration, microwave-assisted extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction Maceration: 24 h, 250 rpm, room temperature ultrasound extraction: 20 kHz, 15 min microwave extraction: 140 W, 1 min 185–504 Ultrasound-assisted extraction proved as a much efficient technique for isolation of polyphenolics extraction efficiency and flavonol content. Sample preparation of propolis played a critical role in obtaining the results Oroian et al ( 2019 ) Carob bark …”
Section: Extraction Methods Of Polyphenolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the heat area is large, and expansion and rupture lead to water loss as well as flavonoid degradation and loss, as is consistent with the results of previous studies [ 24 , 25 ]. Microwave heating is also destructive to cells and facilitates the release of flavonoids, although the short heating time and high heat transfer efficiency do not cause excessive evaporation of water from food, which facilitates the retention of flavonoids [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%