2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ay00573c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of in vitro sample preparation for LC-MS metabolomics applications on HepaRG cell cultures

Abstract: The addition of stabilizers during liquid–liquid extraction improves the precision of untargeted LC-MS metabolomics workflows.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter method replaces CHCl 3 for the less toxic MTBE, which also causes a change in the location of the solvent layers (the organic layer is the upper phase for Matyash's method) [10,75]. Two-phase extractions for a low amount of sample (e.g., 20 µL of plasma, 10 6 cells, 2.5 mg of tissue) have been successfully applied using the above-mentioned (adapted) Bligh and Dyer, and Matyash techniques to analyze each phase with different LC-MS methods selected based on the LogP of the metabolites [54,76,77]. The successful application of these methods shows that reproducible extractions for metabolomics can also be obtained with low sample amounts.…”
Section: Metabolite Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter method replaces CHCl 3 for the less toxic MTBE, which also causes a change in the location of the solvent layers (the organic layer is the upper phase for Matyash's method) [10,75]. Two-phase extractions for a low amount of sample (e.g., 20 µL of plasma, 10 6 cells, 2.5 mg of tissue) have been successfully applied using the above-mentioned (adapted) Bligh and Dyer, and Matyash techniques to analyze each phase with different LC-MS methods selected based on the LogP of the metabolites [54,76,77]. The successful application of these methods shows that reproducible extractions for metabolomics can also be obtained with low sample amounts.…”
Section: Metabolite Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cell cultures were harvested according to previously described protocols, full details are available in SM-3 [12,13]. Briefly, cells were prepared for extraction with a wash in phosphate buffered saline (37 °C) followed by freezing on liquid nitrogen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex organisms usually require more replicates than in vitro cell models to unveil meaningful biological information [ 44 , 54 ]. However, animals in controlled environments (e.g., standardized diet, day–night cycle times, temperature environment) require a smaller amount of replicates than epidemiological studies, but it is still advisable to keep the number of replicates to at least 6 per group [ 10 , 44 ].…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter method replaces CHCl 3 for the less toxic MTBE, which also causes a change in the location of the solvent layers (the organic layer is the upper phase for Matyash’s method) [ 10 , 75 ]. Two-phase extractions for a low amount of sample (e.g., 20 μL of plasma, 10 6 cells, 2.5 mg of tissue) have been successfully applied using the above-mentioned (adapted) Bligh and Dyer, and Matyash techniques to analyze each phase with different LC-MS methods selected based on the LogP of the metabolites [ 54 , 76 , 77 ]. The successful application of these methods shows that reproducible extractions for metabolomics can also be obtained with low sample amounts.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%