2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2006.1656093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of Fusion and Decision Making Techniques for Affordable SPHM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the accuracy achieved previously was further improved [9]: the differences from the BAE SYSTEMS accumulative fatigue after 15 years were improved to 1.11%, 2.41%, -1.11% and 3.57% for Wing 1, Wing 2, Fin and Taileron respectively. For these airframe locations, the network accuracies were better than those of a strain gauge system with 1% error.…”
Section: Figure 11 -Hypercube Parameter Spacementioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was found that the accuracy achieved previously was further improved [9]: the differences from the BAE SYSTEMS accumulative fatigue after 15 years were improved to 1.11%, 2.41%, -1.11% and 3.57% for Wing 1, Wing 2, Fin and Taileron respectively. For these airframe locations, the network accuracies were better than those of a strain gauge system with 1% error.…”
Section: Figure 11 -Hypercube Parameter Spacementioning
confidence: 87%
“…In order to address these objectives, legacy data were used to configure, optimise and test a suite of FUMS TM tools [5] to [9]. The Smiths FUMS TM tools included data quality algorithms, MNs that fuse flight data into prognostic information, dynamic event models, UIs, signal processing tools, AI tools and force life management software that have enabled an efficient application of these tools on large datasets.…”
Section: The Fums Tm Olm Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation