2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11852-012-0230-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation of adjusted barrier management to improve glass eel migration at an estuarine barrier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that the current, low recruitment of juvenile European eel to their freshwater rearing grounds may act as a population bottleneck (e.g. Bult & Dekker, ; Laffaille, Caraguel & Legault, ; Mouton et al ., ). Before the population decline, optimizing upstream passage solutions was not as imperative as it is today, as early passage solutions succeeded in transporting enough eels (due to high densities) past the barriers to reach the carrying capacity of the inland waters upstream of the barrier, at least in south‐western Europe (Dekker, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has been suggested that the current, low recruitment of juvenile European eel to their freshwater rearing grounds may act as a population bottleneck (e.g. Bult & Dekker, ; Laffaille, Caraguel & Legault, ; Mouton et al ., ). Before the population decline, optimizing upstream passage solutions was not as imperative as it is today, as early passage solutions succeeded in transporting enough eels (due to high densities) past the barriers to reach the carrying capacity of the inland waters upstream of the barrier, at least in south‐western Europe (Dekker, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Crump weirs, common barriers to fish migration in the UK (Lucas & Frear 1997;Lucas & Bubb 2005;Russon et al 2010), are used to gauge river discharge as part of flood monitoring, and so retrofitting through installation of fish passes (Rhodes & Servais 2008) is preferred over their removal. Restricted upstream migration of this life stage represents a bottleneck for recruitment, alleviation of which is considered a principal target for conservation efforts (Mouton et al 2014). Restricted upstream migration of this life stage represents a bottleneck for recruitment, alleviation of which is considered a principal target for conservation efforts (Mouton et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study used glass eels as they represent the earliest developmental stage expected to utilise eel passes, and have been observed congregating below anthropogenic barriers (Feunteun et al 1998). Restricted upstream migration of this life stage represents a bottleneck for recruitment, alleviation of which is considered a principal target for conservation efforts (Mouton et al 2014). The first objective of this study was to quantify and compare upstream passage efficiency for an unmodified (no studded eel tiles on the downstream face; control) and modified (with eel tiles on the downstream face; treatment) model Crump weir.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, there is a need to investigate how management of protection structures can be optimised in order to minimise environmental and ecological impacts, whilst also maintaining out-of-stream objectives (e.g. Mouton et al, 2014). Short-term trials are valuable for providing an insight into the potential outcomes, and can be useful for building support with stakeholders, but ultimately there is a need for longer term studies to better understand the best ways to mitigate the effects of instream barriers on aquatic communities and habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have illustrated the benefits of adapted tide gate management for enhancing fish passage. For example, Mouton et al (2014) showed that glass eel (Anguilla anguilla) migration was improved at an estuarine barrier as a consequence of increased barrier opening during tidal rise and Boys et al (2012) observed improvement in both fish and crustacean communities following floodgate remediation. However, there has been little consideration given to mitigating the impact of tide gates on instream habitat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%