Optimisation models to enhance resilience in evacuation planning

Goerigk, Marc; Hamacher, Horst W.

doi:10.1080/10286608.2015.1022729

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Publications that mesh systems thinking with resilience include those of Hsu and Stallins [2], Pham [3], Ge et al [4], Tian and Dai [5], Andersson et al [6], Taranu et al [7], Froese et al [8], Cámara et al [9], Carmichael [10], Goerigk and Hamacher [11], Jowitt and Milke [12], and Porse and Lund [13]. However, these do not present a complete systems picture or attempt to unify the various schools of thought on resilience.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resilience and Systems—A Review

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents, from a systems orientation, a review of the resilience literature since its emergence as an ecological concept in academic parlance in 1973. It argues that much of the resilience literature covers existing ground in that existing engineering systems stability ideas are being reinvented. The review follows modern control systems theory as the comparison framework, where each system, irrespective of its disciplinary association, is represented in terms of inputs, state, and outputs. Modern control systems theory is adopted because of its cohesiveness and universality. The review reveals that resilience can be thought of in terms of adaptive systems and adaptation, where the system has the ability to respond to perturbations and changes through passive and active feedback mechanisms—returning the system state or system form to a starting position or transitioning to another suitable state or form. This systematic and cross-disciplinary review offers the potential for a greater understanding of resilience and the elimination of overlap in the literature, particularly related to terminology.

show abstract