2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimisation as a process for understanding and managing river ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This tight connection between fish and human society underscores the need for formal trade-off analysis between hydropower and food systems, including fish and rice. This task is achievable given the articulation of an ecological objective function for the Mekong, as described above, and the breadth of approaches in multi-objective optimization already available (24,(61)(62)(63).…”
Section: Model Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tight connection between fish and human society underscores the need for formal trade-off analysis between hydropower and food systems, including fish and rice. This task is achievable given the articulation of an ecological objective function for the Mekong, as described above, and the breadth of approaches in multi-objective optimization already available (24,(61)(62)(63).…”
Section: Model Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impact assessment, mitigation strategies and cost‐benefit trade‐offs must be inferred from hypothesised scenarios and data extrapolation (Chen & Olden, ; Poff et al, ; Sabo et al, ). Yet with more than half the world's large rivers already affected by dams (Nilsson, Reidy, Dynesius, & Revenga, ), a holistic framework for ecological assessment remains wanting (Barbour et al, ; Halls & Moyle, ; Jager & Smith, ; Poff & Zimmerman, ; Williams, ). This study considers the relevance of the trophic upsurge hypothesis as an analytical framework for the conservation management of fish biodiversity in regulated rivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One class of environmental flows studies that is explicitly geared toward decision-support involves optimization, by which pre-defined mathematical rules are applied to identify an "optimal" solution to meet an ecological objective [17,43]. Unfortunately, optimization approaches commonly fall short of evaluating ecological responses to hydrologic alteration (e.g., [44,45]) and instead present results only in terms of flow indices, which are implicitly assumed to be acceptable surrogates for ecological outcomes [17].…”
Section: Needs and Challenges Of Decision-support Systems For Water-rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, ecological predictions should be stratified into ecologically meaningful groupings (e.g., taxonomic, functional, or habitat-based) to allow managers to evaluate multiple, and possibly competing, conservation priorities. Aggregated metrics of "ecosystem health" are somewhat vague and subjective [43], but may be useful in some cases to summarize complex ecological information for decision makers. Finally, end-users of the decision-support system must be engaged as primary stakeholders, rather than simply as recipients of the final model, and should be able to implement the DSS without complicated or expensive software development [19,29,51].…”
Section: Toward a Useful And Ecologically Relevant Decision-support Smentioning
confidence: 99%