2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2017.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimally capturing latency dynamics in models of tuberculosis transmission

Abstract: Although different structures are used in modern tuberculosis (TB) models to simulate TB latency, it remains unclear whether they are all capable of reproducing the particular activation dynamics empirically observed. We aimed to determine which of these structures replicate the dynamics of progression accurately. We reviewed 88 TB-modelling articles and classified them according to the latency structure employed. We then fitted these different models to the activation dynamics observed from 1352 infected cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study 39 examining different model structures found that structure E performed either worst or second worst of the six structures examined (depending on the fitting method). In our analysis, structure E performed better than structures A, D, and J, but the root mean squared error was still ten times worse than that of the other structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study 39 examining different model structures found that structure E performed either worst or second worst of the six structures examined (depending on the fitting method). In our analysis, structure E performed better than structures A, D, and J, but the root mean squared error was still ten times worse than that of the other structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic literature review reported in Menzies et al [6] found that these 3 structures accounted for approximately 70% of all published TB models. Both Menzies et al [6] and Ragonnet et al [5] showed that models 1 and 2 gave equally good fit to the available data on the cumulative incidence of TB following infection and it was not possible to distinguish a "best" model. Both studies also found model 3 gave a significantly worse fit, but as this structure is employed in a large proportion of published modelling studies (approximately 50% based on the literature review in [6]) we included it in our analysis.…”
Section: Selection Of Model Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis in Ragonnet et al [5] and Menzies et al [6] compared the various model structures to different data sets and therefore identified different best-fitting parameters. We compare the impact of using these 2 different parameter sources on the model predictions of the impact of preventive therapy.…”
Section: Model Parameterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proportion of infected persons progressing to active disease from early latency was greater for children than adults [11] and each new episode of TB was distinguished according to smear status into smear-positive, smear-negative pulmonary and extrapulmonary. Diabetic persons had an approximately threefold increased risk of progression to active TB following infection (Supplementary Section 14) [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%