2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.98.032315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimally band-limited spectroscopy of control noise using a qubit sensor

Abstract: Classical control noise is ubiquitous in qubit devices, making its accurate spectral characterization essential for designing optimized error suppression strategies at the physical level. Here, we focus on multiplicative Gaussian amplitude control noise on a driven qubit sensor and show that sensing protocols using optimally band-limited Slepian modulation offer substantial benefit in realistic scenarios. Special emphasis is given to laying out the theoretical framework necessary for extending non-parametric m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, as predicting each inner product χ k is Figure 8. The posterior Gaussian Process and true spectrum for a 1/f α model (21), demonstrating that the Gaussian Process formalism does not consider the additional structure provided by the spectral model. For this simulation, each experiment was repeated N=50 times and α was chosen uniformly at random in the interval [1/2,1].…”
Section: Small Data: Hyperparameterized Nonlinear Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, as predicting each inner product χ k is Figure 8. The posterior Gaussian Process and true spectrum for a 1/f α model (21), demonstrating that the Gaussian Process formalism does not consider the additional structure provided by the spectral model. For this simulation, each experiment was repeated N=50 times and α was chosen uniformly at random in the interval [1/2,1].…”
Section: Small Data: Hyperparameterized Nonlinear Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These works can thus be seen as complementary 7 . Recent work has utilized Bayesian parameter estimation in trap ion noise spectroscopy experiments [20,21] as well as optomechanical systems [22].Our paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we motivate the problem from a physical perspective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, obtaining a quantitatively accurate characterization of noise is instrumental to validate theoretical modeling and prediction as well as to design physical-layer quantum control strategies that are optimally tailored to realistic time-dependent noise environments. Acquiring this knowledge is the overarching goal of quantum noise spectroscopy (QNS), a body of techniques through which noise spectra or correlation functions are estimated based on measurements of dynamical observables of the quantum system of interest (a single qubit sensor in the simplest case) under appropriately chosen external controls and measurements [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. In conjunction with algorithmic error mitigation that can be achieved through proper quantum-circuit design and compiling [9,10], spectral properties inferred from QNS are expected to play an important role in enabling near-term intermediate-scale quantum information processors [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that sequence repetition also enforces the emergence of a comb structure in all FFs relevant to high-order dephasing spectra offers a direct means to probe non-Gaussian classical as well as quantum bosonic environments [6,41]. Lastly, compared to other DDbased techniques, such as N -pulse Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill spectroscopy [2], the frequency-comb approach is less susceptible to spectral leakage [5], since it takes higher-order harmonics into account in principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those descriptions usually do not account for other sources of error, such as dephasing, but we know that 1/f-noise severely affects all solid-state devices [28], including quantum dots and superconducting circuits. There have been some experimental attempts at characterizing noise sources outside actual circuits, directly exploring the dynamics of the quantum scatterer using time-resolved methods [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] or Fourier transform spectroscopy [41][42][43][44][45][46]. Those detailed studies require time-resolved measurements and direct control of the quantum scatterer in many cases, something which may be unfeasible or undesirable in waveguide-QED setups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%