“…Multiplying each inequality (16)(17)(18)(19)(20) by the corresponding Lagrange multiplier, we get, respectively,…”
Section: Definition 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [16], Hladık proposed a technique to determine the optimal bounds for nonlinear mathematical programming problems with interval data that ensures the exact bounds to enclose the set of all optimal solutions. Chalco-Cano et al [17] developed a method for solving the considered optimization problem with the interval-valued objective function considering order relationships between two closed intervals. Recently, Karmakar and Bhunia [18] proposed an alternative optimization technique for solving interval objective constrained optimization problems via multiobjective programming.…”
In the paper, the classical exact absolute value function method is used for solving a nondifferentiable constrained interval-valued optimization problem with both inequality and equality constraints. The property of exactness of the penalization for the exact absolute value penalty function method is analyzed under assumption that the functions constituting the considered nondifferentiable constrained optimization problem with the interval-valued objective function are convex. The conditions guaranteeing the equivalence of the sets of LU-optimal solutions for the original constrained interval-valued extremum problem and for its associated penalized optimization problem with the interval-valued exact absolute value penalty function are given.Keywords Interval-valued optimization problem · Exact absolute value penalty function method · Penalized optimization problem with the interval-valued exact absolute value penalty function · Exactness of the exact absolute value penalty function method · LU-convex function
Mathematics Subject Classification 49M30 · 90C25 · 90C30Communicated by
“…Multiplying each inequality (16)(17)(18)(19)(20) by the corresponding Lagrange multiplier, we get, respectively,…”
Section: Definition 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [16], Hladık proposed a technique to determine the optimal bounds for nonlinear mathematical programming problems with interval data that ensures the exact bounds to enclose the set of all optimal solutions. Chalco-Cano et al [17] developed a method for solving the considered optimization problem with the interval-valued objective function considering order relationships between two closed intervals. Recently, Karmakar and Bhunia [18] proposed an alternative optimization technique for solving interval objective constrained optimization problems via multiobjective programming.…”
In the paper, the classical exact absolute value function method is used for solving a nondifferentiable constrained interval-valued optimization problem with both inequality and equality constraints. The property of exactness of the penalization for the exact absolute value penalty function method is analyzed under assumption that the functions constituting the considered nondifferentiable constrained optimization problem with the interval-valued objective function are convex. The conditions guaranteeing the equivalence of the sets of LU-optimal solutions for the original constrained interval-valued extremum problem and for its associated penalized optimization problem with the interval-valued exact absolute value penalty function are given.Keywords Interval-valued optimization problem · Exact absolute value penalty function method · Penalized optimization problem with the interval-valued exact absolute value penalty function · Exactness of the exact absolute value penalty function method · LU-convex function
Mathematics Subject Classification 49M30 · 90C25 · 90C30Communicated by
“…Also, the gH-difference of two intervals A = [a, a] and B = b, b always exists and it is equal to (see Proposition 4 in [13]) The order relation was initially introduced in [10] and used in interval optimization problems, see [4,7,8,15,16].…”
Section: Definition 1 ([13]) the Generalized Hukuhara Difference Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, we follow a similar solution concept as that used in multiobjective programming problem to to define a minimum. In [1,4,5,9,14,15,16,17,18,19] the authors considered the following concept of minimum for interval-valued functions.…”
Section: Interval Optimization Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following definition of convexity for intervalvalued functions is well-known in the literature, for instance see [4,5,15,16,17] and references therein. (4) If (4) satisfies for ≺ then we say that F is strict convex.…”
In this article we examine to necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for interval optimization problems. We introduce a new concept of stationary point for an interval-valued function based on the gH-derivative. We show the importance the this concept from a practical and computational point of view. We introduce a new concept of invexity for gH-differentiable interval-valued function which generalizes previous concepts and we prove that it is a sufficient optimality condition. Finally, we show that the concepts of differentiability, convexity and invexity for interval-valued functions based on the differentiability, convexity and invexity of its endpoint functions are not adequate tools for interval optimization problems.
This paper presents necessary and sufficient conditions for generalized Hukuhara differentiability of interval-valued functions and counterexamples of some equivalences previously presented in the literature, for which important results are based on. Moreover, applications of interval generalized Hukuhara differentiability are presented.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.