2010
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimality approaches to describe characteristic fluvial patterns on landscapes

Abstract: Mother Nature has left amazingly regular geomorphic patterns on the Earth's surface. These patterns are often explained as having arisen as a result of some optimal behaviour of natural processes. However, there is little agreement on what is being optimized. As a result, a number of alternatives have been proposed, often with little a priori justification with the argument that successful predictions will lend a posteriori support to the hypothesized optimality principle. Given that maximum entropy production… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors suggest that water flow in catchments and catchment structure is in accordance with different candidate optimality principles that characterize the associated energy conversions and related thermodynamic limitations (Phillips, 2006;Paik and Kumar, 2010;Phillips, 2010). Woldenberg (1969) showed that basic scaling relationships of river basins can be derived from optimality assumptions regarding stream power.…”
Section: Organizing Principles -A Possible Link Between Catchment Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several authors suggest that water flow in catchments and catchment structure is in accordance with different candidate optimality principles that characterize the associated energy conversions and related thermodynamic limitations (Phillips, 2006;Paik and Kumar, 2010;Phillips, 2010). Woldenberg (1969) showed that basic scaling relationships of river basins can be derived from optimality assumptions regarding stream power.…”
Section: Organizing Principles -A Possible Link Between Catchment Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to these energetic minimization principles, the literature debates several principles that seem to state exactly the opposite (Paik and Kumar, 2010): that systems organize themselves to maximize steady state power (MAXP proposed by Lotka (1922)), steady state net reduction of free energy (MRE -Zehe et al, 2010, 2013, or steady state maximized entropy production (MEP - Paltridge, 1979) associated with environmental flows. The MEP hypothesis has been corroborated within studies that allowed (a) successful predictions of states of planetary atmospheres (Lorenz et al, 2001), (b) identification of parameters of general circulation models (Kleidon et al, 2006), or (c) identification of hydrological model parameters to estimate the annual water balances of the 35 largest basins on earth (Porada et al, 2011).…”
Section: Organizing Principles -A Possible Link Between Catchment Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show that these structures act to maximize dissipation of chemical potential gradients within the soil. Paik & Kumar (2010) provide a review of optimality approaches that have been proposed to characterize fluvial patterns in hydrology and geomorphology. Several of these are related to energetic properties, such as minimum stream power, minimum energy dissipation, maximum friction and minimum energy expenditure.…”
Section: Contents Of This Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…the review by Phillips, 2010 andPaik andKumar, 2010) or from stability analysis of the conservation of sediment and water and transport laws (e.g. Kirkby, 1971;Smith and Bretherton, 1972).…”
Section: River Systems and Organizational Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%