Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Yang Berorientasi Pada Restorative Justice Di Kota Denpasar

Hariyanto, Diah Ratna Sari; Swardhana, Gde Made

doi:10.54629/jli.v18i3.787

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…hal inilah yang paling berbahaya karena sangat riskan merusak masa depan anak. (Sari and Swardhana 2021) Penyelesaian perkara anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan keadilan restoratif dilakukan dengan cara pelaksanaan diversi. Memperhatikan tujuan pelaksanaan diversi di atas, dapat dipahami bahwa diversi merupakan pengalihan proses penyelesaian permasalahan hukum yang sedang dihadapi oleh anak dari proses peradilan formal ke proses peradilan informal.…”

Section: Penyelesaian Permasalahan Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum ...unclassified

Restorative Justice Dalam Penanganan Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum

Al-Ghony,

Wijaya,

Hadi

2024

GOLREV

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Penyelesaian perkara pidana anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum (ABH) melalui pelaksanaan diversi dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan keadilan restoratif, yang mensyaratkan adanya persetujuan korban dan atau keluarga anak korban serta kesediaan anak. Dengan demikian dapat dipahami bahwa penyelesaian perkara ABH tidak selamanya dapat dilaksanakan melalui diversi. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini mengenai, penerapan restorative justice dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, mengenai konsep keadilan restoratif justice. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dan Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analisis, dengan menggunakan sumber data primer dan sekunder. Analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu analisis data kualitatif. Konsep restorative justice dalam Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, dilaksanakan melalui penerapan diversi pada setiap tingkat proses peradilan pidana anak. Diversi merupakan pengalihan penyelesaian perkara anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum dari proses formal (proses dalam pengadilan) ke proses informal, dengan cara musyawarah mufakat yang mengedepankan keadilan restoratif. Restorative justice memberikan perlindungan terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum, karena melalui penerapan diversi anak akan dijauhkan dari proses peradilan formal yang dimungkinkan dapat terabaikannya hak-hak anak dan menimbulkan trauma bagi anak. Tujuan penelitian ini diharapkan keadilan restorative justice dapat memberikan rasa tanggung jawab sosial pada pelaku dan mencegah stigmatisasi pelaku di masa yang akan datang serta diharapkan dalam konsep seperti ini dapat mengurangi penumpukan perkara di pengadilan dan bisa dijadikan solusi dalam pencegahan tindak kejahatan. Konsep restorative justice merupakan keadilan bagi anak dengan mengganti kerugian akibat dari perbuatan yang dilakukan dengan meningkatkan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak.

show abstract

Section: Penyelesaian Permasalahan Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum ...unclassified

Restorative Justice Dalam Penanganan Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum

Al-Ghony,

Wijaya,

Hadi

2024

GOLREV

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to Diah Ratna Sari Hariyanto and Gde Made Swardhana, the phenomenon shows that the results of the agreed diversion are often considered weak because they are different from criminal sanctions which are coercive in nature (Hariyanto & Swardhana, 2021). Historically, a milestone that has always been upheld in criminal law is the principle of legality so that criminal law enforcement is generally resolved through the judiciary (the principle of criminal law does not recognize peace), which means the legal process will continue even though peace has been reached between the parties.…”

Section: Diversion In the Juvenile Criminal Justice System In Law Num...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimizing the Role of Correctional Institution in Resolving Cases Through Diversion at the Class I Correctional Institution of Tangerang

Sa'bani

Zulfa

2023

J Legal, Brief, Legal Brief

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The implementation of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System depends heavily on the effective functioning of Correctional Institutions (BAPAS) in carrying out their duties as correctional technical implementing units. In the judicial process, BAPAS plays a crucial role in conducting research, providing guidance, supervision, and assistance to criminal children. However, the failure of BAPAS to fulfill its responsibilities could result in the failure to achieve the objectives of the law. This study aims to address the role of BAPAS in optimizing diversion efforts for the settlement of cases involving children facing the law, with a focus on the Class I Correctional Institution of Tangerang from 2019-2021. Specifically, the study investigates the extent to which BAPAS is successful in implementing diversion as a means of addressing cases involving juvenile offenders, and identifies the challenges that BAPAS faces in effectively carrying out its diversion duties. This study utilizes socio-legal research, specifically descriptive analytical research, to thoroughly describe and categorize the object of the subject matter. Primary and secondary legal materials, as well as qualitative analysis, are used to gather and analyze data. The study draws inductive conclusions from the data obtained to provide clarity in problem-solving. The findings of the study reveal that the role of BAPAS is significant in the success of diversion efforts to solve cases involving juvenile offenders. However, the study also identifies several challenges that hinder the effective implementation of diversion in the Class I Correctional Institution of Tangerang, as evidenced by the low number of cases that were effectively addressed through diversion compared to the total number of cases handled

show abstract

“…Ketika tindakan pidana anak dilakukan maka tentu anak bertemu dengan muka hukum sehingga negara memberikan diversi untuk melindungi mereka. Diversi ialah solusi terhadap permasalahan peradilan pidana dan dilaksanakan dapat mengurangi over kapasitas yang ada di Lembaga Permasyarakatan, sebagai media guna melindungi anak serta menghindar dari sanksi pidananya yang berpengaruh tidak baik bagi anak, berguna untuk masyarakat dikarenakan diversi mengedepankan keadilan untuk seluruh orang yang bersangkutan (Hariyanto & Swardhana, 2021). Pelaksanaan diversi guna memberiaknnya sanksi tepat serta mendidik dengan tidak menirikberatkan pada pembalasan, selain itu tujuan diversi guna menghindar dari anak dari stigma negatif kepada jiwanya serta tumbuh kembang anak yang terlibat peradilan pidana.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Diversi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

Oktavia

Puspitosari

2023

COMSERVA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Surabaya District Attorney's Office has implemented the concept of diversion settlement against children in conflict with the law as perpetrators of criminal acts with a total number of successful diversion attempts, namely in 2019 a total of 87 cases, in 2020 71 cases and in 2021 39 cases. This study uses a normative juridical method with descriptive analytical research specifications. This study aims to determine legal protection for children with diversion at the Surabaya State Prosecutor's Office as well as obstacles and efforts to overcome the implementation of diversion. The type of data used in this study is secondary data with the first formulation of the problem. How is legal protection for children as perpetrators of the crime of theft with diversion? based on Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System at the Surabaya District Attorney? And the second formulation of the problem are what are the obstacles to the implementation of protection for children as perpetrators of the crime of theft with diversion at the Surabaya District Attorney. The results obtained from the results of this study are the protection given to children as perpetrators of criminal acts of theft, namely with the settlement process outside the court with the concept of diversion settlement. The legal protection that is applied to the prosecutor in solving child theft cases is implemented with reference to Law 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System where diversion must be carried out as an effort to provide legal protection, and there are also obstacles to the implementation of diversion so that the author provides suggestions so that the implementation of diversion can be carried out even better by providing outreach to the community about the role of diversion in resolving cases of children as perpetrators of criminal acts, revision of Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System regarding the timeframe for implementing diversion which is lacking and the last effort is law enforcement in this case, prosecutors must instill diversion better.

show abstract

Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Yang Berorientasi Pada Restorative Justice Di Kota Denpasar

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Restorative Justice Dalam Penanganan Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum

Restorative Justice Dalam Penanganan Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum

Optimizing the Role of Correctional Institution in Resolving Cases Through Diversion at the Class I Correctional Institution of Tangerang

Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Diversi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About