2012
DOI: 10.1177/1045389x12463465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal vibration control of smart composite beams with optimal size and location of piezoelectric sensing and actuation

Abstract: Control performances of smart structures depend on the size and location of the piezoelectric actuators and sensors as well as on the applied control algorithm. This article presents optimal vibration control of a thin-walled composite beam by using the fuzzy optimization strategy based on the particle swarm optimization algorithm. The optimization of the size and location of the conventionally collocated piezoelectric actuators and sensors, and optimization of the controller parameters are performed separatel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, as in Zoric et al (2012), the optimization task is defined as finding the position for the piezoelectric actuators where the control action spends less energy in the effort dispended to attenuating structural vibrations. Therefore, a performance index associated to the system controllability is adopted.…”
Section: Lqr Optimal Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present work, as in Zoric et al (2012), the optimization task is defined as finding the position for the piezoelectric actuators where the control action spends less energy in the effort dispended to attenuating structural vibrations. Therefore, a performance index associated to the system controllability is adopted.…”
Section: Lqr Optimal Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplification purposes, the full modal model can be truncated, assuming that the lower frequency modes are the most important in its time response. Introducing a modal displacement variable , the approximate displacement vector can be represented by a modal superposition of the first modes [Zoric et al (2012), Becker et al (2006)], where the value of is stablished taking into account a compromise between the computational effort versus the required model precision. The modal displacement can, therefore, be represented as: (14) where is a vibration modes matrix truncated to modes.…”
Section: Modal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To design the vibration control system of piezoelectric smart structures, control strategy need to be considered for the desired control performance. Besides, the locations and sizes of the piezoelectric actuators and sensors also have a great influence on the control performance [44]. The areas of structure at which the mechanical strain is highest are always the best locations of actuators and sensors.…”
Section: Harmonic Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar and Narayanan (2008) numerically reveal that, by optimal placement of collocated piezoelectric actuators and sensors, the designed linear quadratic regulator (LQR) optimal controller can achieve effective vibration reduction of the flexible beam, while requiring a smaller control input compared to DVF control. For vibration control of a thin-walled composite beam, Zorić et al (2013) employ the fuzzy optimization strategy to determine the size and the location of piezoelectric actuators and sensors. The particle swarm optimization (PSO) based LQR controller is then designed to maximize the closed-loop damping ratios 6 and minimize the control input.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%