2007
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2006.890695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Transmission Scheduling in Symmetric Communication Models With Intermittent Connectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
97
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown that LCQ stabilizes queue lengths if that is at all feasible, and that in symmetric models it minimizes mean delay within stationary policies that are based on current occupancies and channel states. Similar qualitative properties were shown to hold for analogues of LCQ in the case of multiple transmitters [5] and channel states [12]. Neely [8] provided bounds for mean queue lengths for certain variants of LCQ under the on/off channel model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It was shown that LCQ stabilizes queue lengths if that is at all feasible, and that in symmetric models it minimizes mean delay within stationary policies that are based on current occupancies and channel states. Similar qualitative properties were shown to hold for analogues of LCQ in the case of multiple transmitters [5] and channel states [12]. Neely [8] provided bounds for mean queue lengths for certain variants of LCQ under the on/off channel model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Thirdly, our scheduler considers the data rate from each AP. This is different to work such as [9], which only considers queue length.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is primarily due to the tendency of these policies to 'balance out' the queues in the system, by preferentially serving longer queues. For example, [1] contains a strong sample path optimality result for queue backlogs under stochastically symmetric traffic to parallel queues; this is generalized in [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%