2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal transformations leading to normal distributions of positron emission tomography standardized uptake values

Abstract: Optimization of the Box-Cox transformation, offers a solution for identifying normal SUV transformations for when the log transformation is insufficient. The log transformation is not always the appropriate transformation for producing normally distributed PET SUVs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tumor gadolinium enhancement status (binary variable derived from T1W MRI) and tumor volume were also included as independent variables in the multivariate regression. Before inclusion in the multivariate regression, measurements were log transformed (to better approximate normal distributions) ( 24 ) and scaled to have a mean of zero and standard deviation of 1 (to enable comparison of regression coefficients). The multivariate regression was performed using R version 4.0.2 using the Fitting Linear Models function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tumor gadolinium enhancement status (binary variable derived from T1W MRI) and tumor volume were also included as independent variables in the multivariate regression. Before inclusion in the multivariate regression, measurements were log transformed (to better approximate normal distributions) ( 24 ) and scaled to have a mean of zero and standard deviation of 1 (to enable comparison of regression coefficients). The multivariate regression was performed using R version 4.0.2 using the Fitting Linear Models function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the skewed nature of PET SUV distributions [43], non-parametric statistics were used to analyze the data. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to assess whether there were significant changes in PET uptake from baseline to 12 weeks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET detects, measures, and localizes gamma rays emitted from annihilation events between positrons (emitted by administered positron-emitting isotopes) and electrons, providing for a method to distinguish tissues that have differential radiotracer activities. For example, abnormal changes in tissue metabolic activity can be detected with 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET imaging before structural changes are detectable with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As such, metabolic activity measured from FDG-PET is an important biomarker that is clinically utilized for diagnostic, staging, prognostication, and treatment response assessment purposes in patients with cancer [2][3][4][5] .…”
Section: Background and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In yet other methods, standardization is performed at the image post-processing stage by using various methods such as digital PET phantoms, anatomical standardization with Z-scores, or various image transformation methods. For PET images by iterating the Box-Cox transformation parameter and selecting the parameter that maximized the ShapiroWilk P-value 18 . Orlhac et al proposed the use of a harmonization method (ComBat) initially described for genomic data to normalize radiomic features as measured in PET for removing the center effect while retaining pathophysiologic information 19 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%