Purpose
The aims of the present study were to update the previous report from two randomized clinical trials, now with median follow-up of 16 years, to analyze the effect of radiotherapy timing on local failure and disease-free survival.
Methods and Materials
From July 1986 to April 1993 the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VI randomly assigned 1475 pre/perimenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer to receive 3 or 6 cycles of initial chemotherapy (CT). IBCSG Trial VII randomly assigned 1212 postmenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer to receive tamoxifen for 5 years, or tamoxifen for 5 years with three early cycles of initial CT. For patients who received breast-conserving surgery (BCS), radiotherapy (RT) was delayed until initial CT was completed; 4 or 7 months after BCS for Trial VI and 2 or 4 months for Trial VII. We compared RT-timing groups among 433 patients on Trial VI and 285 patients on Trial VII who received BCS plus RT. Endpoints were local failure, regional/distant failure, and disease-free survival (DFS).
Results
Among pre/perimenopausal patients there were no significant differences in disease-related outcomes. 15-year DFS was 48.2% in the group allocated 3 months initial CT and 44.9% in the group allocated 6 months initial CT (HR=1.12; 95% CI:0.87–1.45). Among postmenopausal patients, 15-year DFS was 46.1% in the no-initial-CT group and 43.3% in the group allocated 3 months initial CT (HR=1.11; 95% CI:0.82–1.51). Corresponding HRs for local failures were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.61–1.46) in Trial VI and 1.51 (95% CI:0.77–2.97) in Trial VII. For regional/distant failures, the respective HRs were 1.15 (95% CI:0.80–1.63) and 1.08 (95% CI:0.69–1.68).
Conclusions
This study confirms that, after more than 15 years of follow-up, it is reasonable to delay radiotherapy until after the completion of standard chemotherapy.