2014 21th Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icbme.2014.7043903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal temporal resolution for decoding of visual stimuli in inferior temporal cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variance of the decoding accuracy was computed and averaged across iterations (over re-selection of trials for each neuron) to get the standard error of the mean decoding accuracy. A separate model was fit for each 150 ms time window (50 ms sliding window), following previous work demonstrating success in using these timing parameters for decoding neural responses in area IT ( Babolhavaeji et al. 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variance of the decoding accuracy was computed and averaged across iterations (over re-selection of trials for each neuron) to get the standard error of the mean decoding accuracy. A separate model was fit for each 150 ms time window (50 ms sliding window), following previous work demonstrating success in using these timing parameters for decoding neural responses in area IT ( Babolhavaeji et al. 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variance of the decoding accuracy was computed at this phase and then averaged across iterations (over re-selection of trials) to get the standard error of the mean decoding accuracy. A separate model was fit for each 150 ms time window (50 ms sliding window), following previous work demonstrating success in using these timing parameters for decoding neural responses in area IT (Babolhavaeji et al 2014) Shuffled label tests were performed to establish decoding performance at chance level to capture bias in the data. Previous work has shown that comparing performance to only theoretical chance level can lead to misinterpretation of decoder performance, as an increase in sample variance of data values will also increase the chance of rejecting the null hypothesis when compared against theoretical chance (Combrisson & Jerbi 2015).…”
Section: Population Decoding Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variance of the decoding accuracy was computed at this phase and then averaged across iterations (over re-selection of trials) to get the standard error of the mean decoding accuracy. A separate model was fit for each 150 ms time window (50 ms sliding window), following previous work demonstrating success in using these timing parameters for decoding neural responses in area IT (Babolhavaeji et al 2014). Default parameters were used if not otherwise stated.…”
Section: Population Decoding Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%