2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3169875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Taxation Under Different Concepts of Justness

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…provides an improved characterization. He also suggests a generalization of equal sacrifice, allowing the utility functions to be person-specific.5 Recent proposals to capture equal sacrifice in a social welfare function are due to Weinzierl (2012) andJessen, Metzing, and Rostam-Afschar (2019). Both criteria support policies that move away from an equal-sacrifice allocation, even in the absence of behavioral responses (unless one takes the limit case of infinite aversion to inequality in sacrifice).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…provides an improved characterization. He also suggests a generalization of equal sacrifice, allowing the utility functions to be person-specific.5 Recent proposals to capture equal sacrifice in a social welfare function are due to Weinzierl (2012) andJessen, Metzing, and Rostam-Afschar (2019). Both criteria support policies that move away from an equal-sacrifice allocation, even in the absence of behavioral responses (unless one takes the limit case of infinite aversion to inequality in sacrifice).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%