2007 IEEE 8th Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications 2007
DOI: 10.1109/spawc.2007.4401425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal subchannel assignment in a two-hop OFDM relay

Abstract: The paper studies subchannel assignment in a two-hop OFDM relay system in which the transmitting nodes (source and relay) have access to channel information and interference-related information. We show that with L-superadditive relay (performance) functions a simple ranking of subchannels leads to the optimal assignment with a very low computational complexity. Numerical results quantify the benefit of subchannel assignment in a frequency-selective channel.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of the direct source-destination link, for the practical case of noisy-relay, by using the property of L-superadditivity of the rate function, the authors of [7] proved that the sorted-SNR CP still remains optimal for sum-rate maximization in dual-hop AF relaying OFDM system. Subsequently, it was further proved in [8], through a different approach, that the sorted-SNR CP scheme is optimal for both AF and DF relaying in the same setup.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the absence of the direct source-destination link, for the practical case of noisy-relay, by using the property of L-superadditivity of the rate function, the authors of [7] proved that the sorted-SNR CP still remains optimal for sum-rate maximization in dual-hop AF relaying OFDM system. Subsequently, it was further proved in [8], through a different approach, that the sorted-SNR CP scheme is optimal for both AF and DF relaying in the same setup.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Proposition 2 is necessary as the basis to prove the general M -hop case. In addition, in [7], the L-superadditivity property [22] is used to show that the sorted-SNR CP is optimal in dual-hop AF relaying for sum-rate maximization. That is, if the source-destination rate over each path can be shown to be L-superadditive, it follows that sorted-SNR pairing is optimal.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the complex search in Step 3, we implement the proposed algorithm with M + 1 sorted lists containing SNRs of first-hop and the second-hops. Our sorting approach for exploiting the structure of Step 3 is similar to [7]. Due to space limitation we omitted the detail of implementation.…”
Section: Mixed Time-scale γ-Fair Af Relay Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case there is no interdependency between frames. For γ = 0, the algorithm is independent of ǫ and the algorithm reduces to a similar algorithm in [7] where no fairness is considered. Indeed, this non-obvious extension of [5] combines both approaches neatly and with a smooth transition.…”
Section: Mixed Time-scale γ-Fair Af Relay Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation