“…(1) For any i ∈ I, (S2) and the right-continuity of H i imply that except on a null set N (i) H i s,t ≥ C H , for any 0 ≤ s < t ≤ T, thus H i ν,ρ ≥ C H , ∀ν, ρ ∈ S 0,T with ν ≤ ρ, a.s. (2.4) (2) If (2.3) is assumed for some j ∈ I, the right-continuity of H j and (2.4) imply that except on a null set N C H ≤ H j s,t ≤ ζ j , for any 0 ≤ s < t ≤ T, thus C H ≤ H j ν,ρ ≤ ζ j , ∀ν, ρ ∈ S 0,T with ν ≤ ρ, a.s. Then Lemma 3.2 of [1] implies that (2.2) holds for j. Hence we see that (2.3) is a stronger condition than (2.2).…”