2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal solution for a cargo revenue management problem with allotment and spot arrivals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…see Han et al (2010), Huang and Chang (2010), Xiao and Yang (2010), Qin et al (2012), Zhuang et al (2012), Hoffmann (2013a), Hoffmann (2013b), and Moussawi-Haidar (2014.…”
Section: Air Cargomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…see Han et al (2010), Huang and Chang (2010), Xiao and Yang (2010), Qin et al (2012), Zhuang et al (2012), Hoffmann (2013a), Hoffmann (2013b), and Moussawi-Haidar (2014.…”
Section: Air Cargomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ex-post optimal price was higher than the overall equilibrium price in that condition; indeed, in the panel for Condition I16 in Figure 2, the highest mean ex-post round profit, which was higher than the equilibrium level by 3% (1401 versus 1360), was achieved by prices that were higher than the equilibrium level. 3 As it turns out, a majority proportion of 62.9% (198 out of 315) of the observed prices lay over the range of prices {100, 110, 120}, which includes the overall equilibrium level (100) and the ex-post optimal level (120). Specifically, many price observations (158 out of 315, or 50.2% of the observations, including seven outliers not 3 Statistical tests-using a GEE approach (see Section 5.4) to account for within subject/session dependencies-show that, in Condition I16, the ex-post round profit was higher than the overall equilibrium prediction at p < 0.01 when the period 1 price was 110 or 120, but not so (p > 0.1) when it was the overall equilibrium level of 100. plotted in Figure 4) were higher than the overall equilibrium, which was ex-post more profitable, on average, than the overall equilibrium price.…”
Section: Period 1 Price (Points)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 As it turns out, a majority proportion of 62.9% (198 out of 315) of the observed prices lay over the range of prices {100, 110, 120}, which includes the overall equilibrium level (100) and the ex-post optimal level (120). Specifically, many price observations (158 out of 315, or 50.2% of the observations, including seven outliers not 3 Statistical tests-using a GEE approach (see Section 5.4) to account for within subject/session dependencies-show that, in Condition I16, the ex-post round profit was higher than the overall equilibrium prediction at p < 0.01 when the period 1 price was 110 or 120, but not so (p > 0.1) when it was the overall equilibrium level of 100. plotted in Figure 4) were higher than the overall equilibrium, which was ex-post more profitable, on average, than the overall equilibrium price. In fact, pricing by the overall equilibrium level yielded an ex-post mean profit of 1349, which was slightly lower than the predicted 1360, and which render pricing at the ex-post optimal level more beneficial (as that would lead to an increase in 3.8% of ex-post mean profit).…”
Section: Period 1 Price (Points)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Bing and Bhatnagar (2013) proposed a model of capacity booking to be divided into several periods of the goods delivery. Likewise, another study introduced two capacity procurement patterns based on booking and non-booking capacity (Moussawi-Haidar, 2014). Approaching departure time, the carrier applies direct capacity sales with a first-infirst serve system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%