2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal siting of DG units in power systems from a probabilistic multi-objective optimization perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a stochastic or probabilistic methodology. Some other measures including chance-constrained programming [14], blind number theory [51], connection number mode [52] and point estimation [53] are used in the literature. After integrating the distributed generation (DG), there are many more uncertain factors in the planning process.…”
Section: Uncertainty Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a stochastic or probabilistic methodology. Some other measures including chance-constrained programming [14], blind number theory [51], connection number mode [52] and point estimation [53] are used in the literature. After integrating the distributed generation (DG), there are many more uncertain factors in the planning process.…”
Section: Uncertainty Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H(x) is vector of equality constraints and I(x) is vector of inequality constraints. [70] Reduction in Loss and sensitivity factor of active power [84] Minimization of power and feeder loss [50] Maximize profitability and minimize power losses [53] Minimizing investment and operation costs, power loss and the customers energy demand loss [9] Optimizing line loading, losses and reactive power capacity [69] MO Optimizing cost of network upgrading, power losses cost, the cost of energy not supplied and customer energy purchased cost [29] Function of line loading and reactive power losses, minimizing the total power loss [66] Optimization of the network losses and benefit/cost relation [62] Minimization of system losses, network disruption cost and maximizing DG rating [85] Dynamic SO Saving in electricity bills [38] The difference between benefits & costs [87] Energy losses [54,86] Loss adjustment factor & individual generation load factor [86] Category Type…”
Section: Subject To the Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Axial compressor blade shape optimization was performed by multi-objective optimization by Samad and Kim [16,17]. The NSGA-II algorithm is also successfully applied in various power system problems such as multi-objective siting of DG units in power system [18], multi-objective generation expansion planning [19], coordinate the charging process of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) in the context of energy hubs [20] and reactive power planning [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%