2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2008.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal shapes of mechanically motivated surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the number of design control points go up, more complex shapes can be designed. This comes, however, on the cost of numerical challenges, a well-known issue from finite element methods (Bletzinger et al 2010). These challenges, and solution strategies to remedy them, are discussed in this section.…”
Section: Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the number of design control points go up, more complex shapes can be designed. This comes, however, on the cost of numerical challenges, a well-known issue from finite element methods (Bletzinger et al 2010). These challenges, and solution strategies to remedy them, are discussed in this section.…”
Section: Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An inherent challenge in numerical shape optimization is to maintain a high quality of the computational mesh as the shape of the domain changes during optimization (Mohammadi and Pironneau 2004;Bletzinger et al 2010). This also applies in an isogeometric approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the final form is the direct result of equilibrium and is influenced intensively by the materiality and the boundary condition applied. [8,17,18] (fig 1c)  Topology optimization: The last stream can be resumed under topology and shape optimization problems. These methods combined with evolutionary algorithms, often result in free-form spatial objects, which although have been generated based on a structural criteria, fall into the first category, where they are geometrically approximated in order to be built.…”
Section: Geometry Of Space Structures: a Survey On "Form-element" Reamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods combined with evolutionary algorithms, often result in free-form spatial objects, which although have been generated based on a structural criteria, fall into the first category, where they are geometrically approximated in order to be built. [1](b) Free-form design and panelling approximation [2](c) Equilibrium forms either in tension or compression [8](d) Free-form obtained from a topology optimization process [10] In fact, according to the free-form design, it starts generally with a "complex form" which ends up with multiple typologies of elements in a top-bottom process, and "complex connection technologies", where structural elements follow offsets of the external form. Indeed, we ask the question whether the same free-form practice should be followed in context of timber construction.…”
Section: Geometry Of Space Structures: a Survey On "Form-element" Reamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the underlying mechanical statement for the computation of prestressed surfaces is the demand for equilibrium, which resembles the geometrical explanation of minimizing the area content in the case of isotropic prestress fields [3,5,6,9]. The latter fact is the conclusion of the well-known soap film analogy.…”
Section: Introduction: Plateau's Problem and Its Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%