1987
DOI: 10.1109/mper.1987.5527414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Set-Point Scheduling in a Boiler-Turbine System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each objective function, only one of the two deviation terms is nonzero, that is always holds; therefore measures the underachievement, , and the overachievement, , of a goal. The NGP method minimizes a metric of the deviations from the target objectives, instead of directly minimizing the objective functions of the general formulation in (4). As the utility function method, the NGP formulation is in the form of a singleobjective problem, constrained by all the objective functions stated as goals, and can be solved numerically with any appropriate scalar optimization algorithm.…”
Section: B Nonlinear Goal Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each objective function, only one of the two deviation terms is nonzero, that is always holds; therefore measures the underachievement, , and the overachievement, , of a goal. The NGP method minimizes a metric of the deviations from the target objectives, instead of directly minimizing the objective functions of the general formulation in (4). As the utility function method, the NGP formulation is in the form of a singleobjective problem, constrained by all the objective functions stated as goals, and can be solved numerically with any appropriate scalar optimization algorithm.…”
Section: B Nonlinear Goal Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], sub-optimal setpoint values are calculated using the dynamic model of a power unit as a constraint for the optimization of a single objective function. In [5] a fuzzy inference system generates pressure set-points to minimize steam throttling losses during cyclic operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFDs for selected individual components were shown in Tables 6 and 7 The probability of an energy blackout for the MEG can be illustrated by compensating the individual component failure rates in Equation (5). It shows that the top event risk reduced 10 −4 times by utilizing the proposed IPL and SIF components, discussed in Section 3.5, where the PFD became 1.6114 × 10 −6 while it was originally 0.1992 for the conventional energy grids.…”
Section: Fault Tree For Megmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A MEG is comprised of complex systems with varied response characteristics at various time-scales. Therefore, a hierarchical pattern is recommended for the control topology of such complex systems [5,6]. It includes an overall supervisory control independent protection layer (IPL), which determines the set-points of the significant operation parameters of the MEG based on energy demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the control of a nonlinear drum-type boilerturbine system has been investigated by several researchers, such as Chen et al, Moon et al, Peng et al, Dieck-Assad et al, and others, suggesting a number of appropriate solutions in the area of the present system control [1][2][3][4]. The dynamic matrix control (DMC) scheme, as an efficient algorithm in the field of process control, is realized based on the multiple model approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%