2009
DOI: 10.1080/07474940902816809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Sequential Tests for Two Simple Hypotheses

Abstract: Suppose that at any stage of a statistical experiment a control variable X that affects the distribution of the observed data Y can be used. The distribution of Y depends on some unknown parameter θ, and we consider the classical problem of testing a simple hypothesis H 0 : θ = θ 0 against a simple alternative H 1 : θ = θ 1 allowing the data to be controlled by X, in the following sequential context.The experiment starts with assigning a value X 1 to the control variable and observing Y 1 as a response. After … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0
12

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(6 reference statements)
3
72
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of Lemma 1 is almost identical to that of Lemma 3.5 in [27]. Below in this section, under more specific conditions, we give less trivial (and more interesting from the theoretical and practical points of view) examples of F satisfying Assumption 1.…”
Section: General Stopping Rulesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proof of Lemma 1 is almost identical to that of Lemma 3.5 in [27]. Below in this section, under more specific conditions, we give less trivial (and more interesting from the theoretical and practical points of view) examples of F satisfying Assumption 1.…”
Section: General Stopping Rulesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It is worth noting that the method developed in Section 2 has been applied (for particular processes) to solving several general problems in statistical sequential analysis (see [26][27][28]). Further possible applications of our results could appear in models of statistical sequential analysis with dependent observations, in detecting changes in non-Markovian discrete-time processes, and in some models of risk theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 3.17) The optimal stopping rule Ψ n follows directly from the definition of ρ n , see, e.g., (Novikov, 2009;Poor and Hadjiliadis, 2009).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of Theorem 3.1 follows from the fundamental results of optimal stopping theory. We follow here the proofs stated in Fauß and Zoubir (2015); Novikov (2009);Poor and Hadjiliadis (2009). In this proof, a truncated optimal stopping problem with finite horizon N ≥ 1 is considered with the cost c n for stopping at time n. Let V n = min{c n , E [V n+1 | t n ]} , n < N be the cost for stopping at the optimal time instant between n and N with basis V N = c N .…”
Section: A Proof Of Theorem 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ρ k ∈ P. Following the techniques developed in [22], [23], (14) can be straightforwardly solved as follows, where we omit the details in the interest of space: Let m0 and m1 denote the number of 0's and 1's observed. The likelihood-ratios of the corresponding observations under P0 and Pρ k , with respect to Pρ * are given by…”
Section: Joint Detection and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%