2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2007.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal sensor network design for multirate systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors showed that redundancy in measurements improved the estimation accuracy. Kadu et al considered the effect of different sampling frequencies on state estimation accuracy and developed a methodology to solve an implicit multiobjective optimization problem. Conversely, Madron and Veverka adopted a Gauss–Jordan elimination method for achieving observability of all key variables at the minimum cost of the sensor network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors showed that redundancy in measurements improved the estimation accuracy. Kadu et al considered the effect of different sampling frequencies on state estimation accuracy and developed a methodology to solve an implicit multiobjective optimization problem. Conversely, Madron and Veverka adopted a Gauss–Jordan elimination method for achieving observability of all key variables at the minimum cost of the sensor network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These individual and unrelated treatments usually produce sub-optimal solutions from the plant-wide control point of view. The OSL field generally uses investment costs, observability, Kalman filter theory and dynamic models to define the sensors network by means of integer optimization routines (Musulin et al, 2005;Singh and Hahn, 2005;Kadu et al, 2008;Bhushan et al, 2008). Generally, these strategies are developed on process in open loop or with an already existing control policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimator design involves decisions on: (i) the structure (sensor number and locations), and (ii) the kind of (EKF, Luenberger, Geometric, etc) algorithm. In the distillation column estimation field: (i) the EKF has been, by far, the most widely employed and accepted algorithm, (ii) the sensor structure has been decided with heuristics (Oisiovici and Cruz, 2000) or observability measures (van der Berg et al 2000;Singh and Hahn, 2005), (ii) only in a few studies (Alonso et al, 2004;Bian and Henson 2006;Venkateswarlu and Kumar, 2006;Kadu et al, 2008) the measure-based sensor location results have been tested with estimator functioning and is not clear to what extent the results depend on tuning. In principle, the resolution of this drawback requires a unified framework to address the algorithm, sensor location, and tuning aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%