Proceeding of the 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control (ISIC '01) (Cat. No.01CH37206)
DOI: 10.1109/isic.2001.971520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal sensor choice for observability in free-choice Petri nets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that (16) is solved by searching through s ∈ U \ S cur . Furthermore, (17) means that sensors costing more than ct * are not considered. This criterion is based on the instantaneous performance improvement of the candidate sensor and is myopic.…”
Section: A Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that (16) is solved by searching through s ∈ U \ S cur . Furthermore, (17) means that sensors costing more than ct * are not considered. This criterion is based on the instantaneous performance improvement of the candidate sensor and is myopic.…”
Section: A Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other work on optimal senor selection for DEDS includes [15], [17]- [20]. While [15] addresses computational issues regarding sensor selection for DEDS modeled as finite automata, [17], [18] considers optimal sensor selection for satisfying observability properties in Petri nets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To characterize structural observability, we generalize the event-detectability property [11], which was originally defined only for unobservable transitions. Notice that there are extreme situations where the Petri net can be structurally observable but never be event-detectable.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, there is limited previous work on the sensor selection problem when the underlying model is a Petri net. In [11], [12], observability notions are used as criteria when optimizing the selection of sensors in interpreted Petri net (IPN) models [13]. In [12], genetic algorithms are used to approximate the optimal sensor selection, but the main disadvantage is that they converge very slowly to a suboptimal solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%