2017
DOI: 10.18359/rcin.1714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal selection of the CA-CFAR adjustment factor for K power sea clutter with statistical variations

Abstract: <p>La presencia de la señal interferente de <em>clutter </em>marino establece limitaciones en la calidad de la detección de radar en ambientes costeros y de alta mar. El procesador CA-CFAR es la solución clásica para detectar blancos de radar. Usualmente mantiene su factor de ajuste constante todo el período de operación. Como consecuencia, el esquema no toma en consideración las variaciones estadísticas de la señal de fondo cuando realiza la discriminación del <em>clutter</em>. P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the selection of T depends on the wanted false alarm rate, the authors selected three classical P f values to design the solution: P f = 10 -2 , P f = 10 -3 and P f = 10 -4 . These figures are a common choice in radar related investigations and were previously used in [20], [21]. The designer may choose any of these P f s according to its requirements.…”
Section: Samples From Radar Readingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the selection of T depends on the wanted false alarm rate, the authors selected three classical P f values to design the solution: P f = 10 -2 , P f = 10 -3 and P f = 10 -4 . These figures are a common choice in radar related investigations and were previously used in [20], [21]. The designer may choose any of these P f s according to its requirements.…”
Section: Samples From Radar Readingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology followed was similar to that described in [20], [21]. An amount of 40 σ values, uniformly distributed in the range between 0,025 and 1,25, were chosen and a group of one million LN samples was generated for each σ value.…”
Section: Building the Transformation Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%