2001
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal seismic response control with dampers

Abstract: The usefulness of energy dissipation devices to reduce seismic response of structures is now well established. For a given installation of such devices in a structure, one can easily compute the level of response reduction achieved. However, the solution of an inverse problem of how many devices one would need to achieve a desired level of response reduction in a structure, or to achieve an expected level of performance from a structural system, is not quite as straightforward and well formulated. In this pape… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The main limitation of this method is that this applies only to structures that fit the definitions given in Equation (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main limitation of this method is that this applies only to structures that fit the definitions given in Equation (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over many years, research efforts have been aimed at reliable and cost-effective design practices. Optimal design methodologies for passive dampers based on a number of theories have been proposed for determining both damper sizes as in [7][8][9][10][11] and damper locations as in [12][13][14][15] among others. They commonly differ on how the optimisation problem is addressed and in which cost function and constraints the optimisation problem are subjected to.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the use of FVDs seems natural for seismic retrofitting where both displacements and forces due to earthquakes are to be decreased. Indeed, optimal design of such dampers for the purpose of seismic retrofitting of frame structures received much attention (Zhang and Soong, 1992;Gluck et al, 1996;Takewaki, 1997;Singh and Moreschi, 2001;Lopez-Garcia and Soong, 2002;Dargush and Sant, 2005;Lavan and Levy, 2005, 2009Aydin et al, 2007;Lavan et al, 2008;Lavan and Dargush, 2009;Adachi et al, 2013;Aguirre et al, 2013;Kanno, 2013;Martínez et al, 2013;Sonmez et al, 2013;Gidaris and Taflanidis, 2014;Hatzigeorgiou and Pnevmatikos, 2014;Lavan and Amir, 2014;Lin et al, 2014;Lavan, 2015). To allow a quick examination of whether such devices are a good alternative, simple methodologies for initial design were proposed as well (FEMA 356, 2000;Palermo et al, 2013;Landi et al, 2014;Rama Raju et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of them primarily address the problem of distributing a given total added damping to achieve the best performance (minimize damage measures). Some of the works in this direction presented very efficient methods [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Note that in these works the total added damping is predetermined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%