2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2020.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal scaling of random-walk metropolis algorithms on general target distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the acceptance rate of the adapted KGE is around 20% for a system that we have good input and observations (case study 2). This is similar to the formal likelihood function and is also close to the theoretically optimal acceptance rate (0.234) in Metropolis algorithms with random walk (Yang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In particular, the acceptance rate of the adapted KGE is around 20% for a system that we have good input and observations (case study 2). This is similar to the formal likelihood function and is also close to the theoretically optimal acceptance rate (0.234) in Metropolis algorithms with random walk (Yang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…[55] compares the ergodicity properties of a delayed-acceptance algorithm with those of the parent MH algorithm, while [28] compares the asymptotic variance of the ergodic average from a delayed-acceptance algorithm with the variance of an importance-sampling estimator which takes as its proposal a sample from an MCMC algorithm targeting a surrogate. Historically, insights into the performance and tuning of MCMC algorithms have been obtained by examining the limiting behaviour of a rescaled version of the Markov chain as the dimension of the statespace increases to infinity [6,8,44,45,46,57,62,63]. In this article, we focus on random-walk proposals since this class of methods has the advantage of not requiring further information about the target, such as the local gradient or Hessian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accepting that σ 2 n is the optimal decay rate for proposal variances, we turn our attention to choosing the that maximises the ESJD, equivalently (as it will turn out) determining the optimal average acceptance rate. Revisiting (34), W ( ) takes the form…”
Section: −→mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it proves optimal as n → ∞ to choose the constant of proportionality so as to obtain average acceptance rates of 0.234 of the proposed moves for RWM and 0.574 for MALA. These results were originally proved only for the toy example of product targets given above; nevertheless simulation evidence suggests that they should hold in much greater generality and notable progress has been made to generalise the theory towards more general targets, especially in the case of RWM: see, for example, Yang, Roberts and Rosenthal [34]. Consequently the theory does indeed provide very practical and useful guidelines for practitioners, and additionally provides an important context for motivating and assessing adaptive MCMC methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%