“…In the context of modern pedoanthracology, such sampling may be considered a high standard; many studies analysed 90 charcoal fragments per sample (e.g., Nelle, Dreibrodt, & Dannath, ; Quednau & Ludemann, ; Robin, Bork, Nadeau, & Nelle, ; Robin, Knapp, & Bork, ) and some other not more than 50 charcoal fragments (e.g., Compostella, Trombino, & Caccianiga, ; Moser, Di Pasquale, Scarciglia, & Nelle, ). Several authors recommended a minimum of 250 charcoal fragments per layer to be analysed in archaeo‐anthracological studies (e.g., Damblon & Haesaerts, ; Damblon, Haesaerts, & van der Plicht, ), whereas Feiss et al () recommended even higher minima for pedoanthracological studies (up to 500–600 charcoals). However, the latter author himself performed considerably lower numbers of identifications and used rather low‐resolution subsampling (four to five samples per profile) that illustrates the difficulty in practical adherence to such a recommendation.…”