2019
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Sales Schemes for Network Goods

Abstract: This paper examines the optimal sequencing of sales in the presence of network externalities. A firm sells a good to a group of consumers whose payoff from buying is increasing in total quantity sold. The firm selects the order to serve consumers so as to maximize expected sales. It can serve all consumers simultaneously, serve them all sequentially, or employ any intermediate scheme. We show that the optimal sales scheme is purely sequential, where each consumer observes all previous sales before choosing whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou and Chen (2018) examine the pricing decisions for this sequential problem. In an independent study, Parakhonyak and Vikander (2019) also discuss the benefit of sequential launch with payoff externalities without signaling.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou and Chen (2018) examine the pricing decisions for this sequential problem. In an independent study, Parakhonyak and Vikander (2019) also discuss the benefit of sequential launch with payoff externalities without signaling.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the consumer considers the same two products but this time on a platform that has been adopted by other users (i.e., it has an installed base greater than one), she may expect to derive some benefits from the product's social features. This is true even if she does not know the exact size of the product's user base, given that consumers often anticipate the size of a product's user base in the presence of network effects (e.g., Farrell & Saloner, 1986;Parakhonyak & Vikander, 2019;Schilling, 2003). Note that our stylized example holds even when we allow a product to offer any combination of standalone functionality and network functionality, so long as there is some (either perceived or actual) tradeoff between a firm's investments in standalone functionality and its investments in social features.…”
Section: The Mixed Effects Of Incorporating Social Features On Becomi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the consumer considers the same two products but this time on a platform that has been adopted by other users (i.e., it has an installed base greater than one), she may expect to derive some benefits from the product's social features. This is true even if she does not know the exact size of the product's user base, given that consumers often anticipate the size of a product's user base in the presence of network effects (e.g., Farrell & Saloner, 1986; Parakhonyak & Vikander, 2019; Schilling, 2003).…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for example, the buyers in I 1 are charged markups in G but offered discounts in G which is obtained from G by adding a link between 2 and 8 30. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%