2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2007.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal robust linearized impulsive rendezvous

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides observability, safety which is related to trajectory dispersion and fuel efficiency since satellites usually have a tight mass budget should be tradeoff at the meantime. Tang et al [23] and Luo et al [24][25][26] took the navigation and control error into consideration and defined the open-loop optimal robust rendezvous planning method, making tradeoff between fuel consumption, rendezvous time, and trajectory robustness. Li et al [27] furtherly constructed closed-loop multiple objective optimization problem (MOOP) considering the position robustness, velocity robustness, and fuel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides observability, safety which is related to trajectory dispersion and fuel efficiency since satellites usually have a tight mass budget should be tradeoff at the meantime. Tang et al [23] and Luo et al [24][25][26] took the navigation and control error into consideration and defined the open-loop optimal robust rendezvous planning method, making tradeoff between fuel consumption, rendezvous time, and trajectory robustness. Li et al [27] furtherly constructed closed-loop multiple objective optimization problem (MOOP) considering the position robustness, velocity robustness, and fuel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the error analysis in [12][13][14][15][16] are executed after the completion of normal trajectory design, therefore being not incorporated into the closed-loop of design. Recently, Tang et al has reported the combination of optimal normal rendezvous design with error analysis [17]. It is shown in this study that the proposed approach can evaluate different rendezvous maneuver schemes and at the same time quickly determine the relation between the propellant cost and the trajectory robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…navigation errors is incorporated in this study, whereas only control errors are considered in [17]; (2) We introduce the robustness performance into the multi-objective of propellant-optimal and time-optimal rendezvous problem, while the singleobjective of propellant-optimal time-fixed problem in [17]; and (3) The goal of this study is to demonstrate the relation between the robustness performance index, the time of rendezvous and the propellant cost regarding both control error and navigation errors, while the previous works [18,19] have only demonstrated the relation between the trajectory safety performance index, the time of rendezvous and the propellant cost in the normal rendezvous trajectory design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in addition to considering the propellant consumption and the rendezvous time, trajectory robustness has been gotten attention in the trajectory design of autonomous rendezvous [11,12], where the fixed levels of navigation and control errors are considered in the optimization, in this way, the scopes of relative state dispersion can be optimized. However, the navigation and control errors of the actual close-looped autonomous rendezvous must differ from the fixed levels of navigation and control errors, and research into optimal multi-objective trajectory design based on close-looped control is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%