1992
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(92)90048-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal reserve requirements, deposit taxation, and the demand for money

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is similar to a result obtained by Mourmouras and Russell (1992), who show, in a model with homogeneous agents but risky returns on privately-issued assets, that when the government seeks to maximize steady-state utility the optimal allocation can always be supported by a combination of an unaugmented inflation tax and a proportional tax on deposits.…”
Section: Proposition 2 Suppose the Government Is Not Concerned About supporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is similar to a result obtained by Mourmouras and Russell (1992), who show, in a model with homogeneous agents but risky returns on privately-issued assets, that when the government seeks to maximize steady-state utility the optimal allocation can always be supported by a combination of an unaugmented inflation tax and a proportional tax on deposits.…”
Section: Proposition 2 Suppose the Government Is Not Concerned About supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, this paper extends the literature on optimal single reserve requirementsa literature that includes contributions by Freeman {1987), Brock (1989), Bencivenga and Smith (1992), Mourmouras and Russell (1992), Cothren and Waud (1994), and E:spinosa and Yip (1996) -to the case of multiple reserve requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One alternative way to characterize the relationship between an inßation tax and a tax on social security beneÞts involves an equivalence result that is very closely related to Theorem 2. This result, which we will call Proposition 2, establishes that any monetary equilibrium with government currency, 13 Note that in the previous economy, where there were no binding reserve requirements, we could replace the bonds with currency, or vice-versa, rather trivially, since both had the same real rate of return. This is an example of the irrelevance of open market operations in economies of this type: see Sargent (1987, ch.…”
Section: Saving-based Social Securitymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…2 There is also a literature that asks whether the allocations supported by particular monetary policy regimes can be supported by monetary policy regimes of a different type. Examples include Mourmouras and Russell (1992) and Bacchetta and Caminal (1994). 3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%