2018
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal repetition time reduction for single subject event‐related functional magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: Modest TR reductions (to 1000 ± 200 ms) optimally improved event-related fMRI performance independent of design frequency. Autoregressive models with a local as opposed to global fit performed better, while low order autoregressive models were sufficient at the optimal TR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implications of such discrepancies between the serial structure of short-TR data and parametric models implemented in common toolkits have been cautioned by several studies (Bollmann et al, 2018;Eklund et al, 2012;McDowell and Carmichael, 2018;Olszowy et al, 2018;Sahib et al, 2016), and the proposed solutions include invoking nonparametric alternatives (e.g., (Woolrich et al, 2001)) or a slightly more complicated parametric model (essentially with more free parameters for model fittings), such as higher-order AR models (Bollmann et al, 2018;Jacobs et al, 2014;Sahib et al, 2016;Worsley et al, 2002), and the new FAST option of SPM (https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/), which fits the serial correlation structure with more versatile dictionary components based on exponential covariance functions (Corbin et al, 2018;Todd et al, 2016). These more complicated models flexibly adapt to data collected at different TRs and have been demonstrated to be effective.…”
Section: Modeling Signal and Noise Autocorrelations At Sub-second Trsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implications of such discrepancies between the serial structure of short-TR data and parametric models implemented in common toolkits have been cautioned by several studies (Bollmann et al, 2018;Eklund et al, 2012;McDowell and Carmichael, 2018;Olszowy et al, 2018;Sahib et al, 2016), and the proposed solutions include invoking nonparametric alternatives (e.g., (Woolrich et al, 2001)) or a slightly more complicated parametric model (essentially with more free parameters for model fittings), such as higher-order AR models (Bollmann et al, 2018;Jacobs et al, 2014;Sahib et al, 2016;Worsley et al, 2002), and the new FAST option of SPM (https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/), which fits the serial correlation structure with more versatile dictionary components based on exponential covariance functions (Corbin et al, 2018;Todd et al, 2016). These more complicated models flexibly adapt to data collected at different TRs and have been demonstrated to be effective.…”
Section: Modeling Signal and Noise Autocorrelations At Sub-second Trsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could only hypothesise that acquiring 800 timepoints and using multislice short TR acquisition improved our sensitivity and specificity similarly to the event-related fMRI studies available in the literature (60).…”
Section: Strengths Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The steady-state MR signal was reduced at shorter TRs. At the short TR acquisition, image signal was exponentially reduced due to decreased T1 recovery within the TR [ 10 , 22 ]. Therefore, a shorter TR might have a punitive effect on image signal levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short TR within the range of 300 ms to 600 ms was recommended for more captured information per unit time and more accurate representation of the BOLD response [ 24 ]. On the other hand, moderate reduction of TR (1000 ± 200 ms) was also chosen for greater sensitivity and specificity in signal subject event-related fMRI [ 22 ]. The difference of optimal TR was thought to be caused by the differences in the experimental design, SMS acquisition parameters, and fMRI data analysis measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%