2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal relaxation collisions for lattice Boltzmann methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The special case of τ 2 = 1/6 corresponds to the classic fourth order compact finite difference approximation for second order derivatives at grid points [30]. This value gives precisely the "optimal" collision time reported by Holdych et al [26] and is similar to that of Zhao [51], as found from a truncation error analysis of the lattice Boltzmann equation. The choice of τ 2 = 3/16 will eliminate the body force error while τ 2 = 1/4 eliminates the recurrence for T xx on the left hand side of equation (3.19).…”
Section: Momentssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The special case of τ 2 = 1/6 corresponds to the classic fourth order compact finite difference approximation for second order derivatives at grid points [30]. This value gives precisely the "optimal" collision time reported by Holdych et al [26] and is similar to that of Zhao [51], as found from a truncation error analysis of the lattice Boltzmann equation. The choice of τ 2 = 3/16 will eliminate the body force error while τ 2 = 1/4 eliminates the recurrence for T xx on the left hand side of equation (3.19).…”
Section: Momentssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…As a result, smaller truncation errors can be achieved when relaxation times are less than 1.0. Therefore, in the BGK method, both relaxation times should be in the range (0.5-1] to obtain maximum stability and accuracy [22,24,51,[54][55][56]. According to Equations ( 13) and ( 14), at very high or very low Pr numbers, the relaxation time for either fluid flow or energy equation becomes τ ≈ 0.5 or τ 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it has been proved by previous studies that the ideal value of τ g is around 1.0, which achieves optimal stability [36,37], the sub-operator equation L 1 is solved by the LBM solver for convection-diffusion equation and α o is chosen to be c 2…”
Section: Temperature Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%