1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00040-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal prey size for early turbot larvae (Scophthalmus maximus L.) based on mouth and ingested prey size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
1
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
65
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes along with an increase in enzymatic activity (Alvarez-González, 2003;Peña et al, 2009) enhance the digestive capability. Likewise, the tail segment showed negative allometric growth; however, the positive allometry of the TD and MH contribute to increasing the swimming capabilities, and together with the development of the ML allow the ingestion of bigger prey (Cunha and Planas, 1999). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes along with an increase in enzymatic activity (Alvarez-González, 2003;Peña et al, 2009) enhance the digestive capability. Likewise, the tail segment showed negative allometric growth; however, the positive allometry of the TD and MH contribute to increasing the swimming capabilities, and together with the development of the ML allow the ingestion of bigger prey (Cunha and Planas, 1999). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, according to several authors prey size and other factors related to fish size including, for example, handling ability of fishes are important variables that determine food selection (Cunha and Planas 1999, de Crespin de Billy et al 2002, Sánchez-Hernández et al 2011a). This study shows that the size-frequency distribution of gastrointestinal tracts was not identical to that in the benthos and drift samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) In general, fishes select preferentially -or are more efficient at capturing -prey that represent a certain proportion of their gape, mouth width or section (Shirota 1970;Cunha and Planas 1999). In H. longifilis, there is a slightly negative allometric growth of mouth dimensions and a positive allometric growth of body depth (Baras 1999).…”
Section: Size-dependent Variations Of Optimal Prey Size (Dm Topt )mentioning
confidence: 99%