2017 Ieee Urucon 2017
DOI: 10.1109/urucon.2017.8171891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal power flow solution including the syncronous generator capability curve constraints with a convex relaxation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…active and reactive power markets). Many studies have not considered opportunity costs when scheduling active and reactive powers [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In certain studies the opportunity cost is defined in different ways [18,[33][34][35].…”
Section: Status Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…active and reactive power markets). Many studies have not considered opportunity costs when scheduling active and reactive powers [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In certain studies the opportunity cost is defined in different ways [18,[33][34][35].…”
Section: Status Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the price‐sensitive demands were not considered. In references [20] and [21], capability curve constraints were incorporated into the ACOPF problem as convex constraints. Reactive power locational marginal pricing was proposed in reference [22]; however, only the armature limit was considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Diesel generator active and reactive power limits for each time slot (Generator capability curves) [38], [39]: a) Prime-mover limits for each time slot: Limits on the mechanical power input from the primemover impose constraints on the active power generation and scheduled reserve.…”
Section: ) First Stage Inequality Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%