2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal power flow by means of improved adaptive differential evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2020, Shuijia Li et al [2], proposed a JADE about the self-adaptive penalty constraint handling method, indicated as EJADE-SP, to attain the best solution of OPF problem. The proposed method was an improved adaptation of JADE, whereas four enhancements were developed to improve the JADE performance while resolving the OPF problem: CR sorting model was developed to permit individuals to inherit additional superior genes; re-randomizing parameters (CR and scale factor) to preserve the search competence and variety; dynamic population lessening approach was exploited to accelerate convergence, and self-adaptive penalty constraint handling method was combined to tackle about constraints.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2020, Shuijia Li et al [2], proposed a JADE about the self-adaptive penalty constraint handling method, indicated as EJADE-SP, to attain the best solution of OPF problem. The proposed method was an improved adaptation of JADE, whereas four enhancements were developed to improve the JADE performance while resolving the OPF problem: CR sorting model was developed to permit individuals to inherit additional superior genes; re-randomizing parameters (CR and scale factor) to preserve the search competence and variety; dynamic population lessening approach was exploited to accelerate convergence, and self-adaptive penalty constraint handling method was combined to tackle about constraints.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the detail in which there are numerous control variables, and not all, are incessant, such as the shunt capacitor outputs, OPF problem is believed as a multi-modal, non-convex, large-scale, and non-linear constrained optimization problem [13] [14] [15]. In the interim, this as well creates resolving the OPF problem a significant problem in power system optimization [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical approach, including linear programming [7], nonlinear programming [8], quadratic programming [9], interior point method [10] and Newton-based methods [11], provides the optimal solution of OPF problems; however, several drawbacks of this approach are also inevitable. For example, some of the noticeable shortcomings of existing mathematical approaches include no guarantee of accuracy for the linear program, poor convergence and algorithm complication for the non-linear programming, the sensitivity of initial guess for the Newton-based algorithm, solving complexities aroused for non-linear and quadratic objective functions in the interior point algorithm [12]. In addition, mathematical approaches have issues in finding global optima (i.e., trapping in local optima) and specific objective function restrictions, such as prohibited operating zones, valve point effects and piece-wise quadratic cost function [3,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid DE and harmony search (HS) algorithms were developed in [28]who replaced operation of the evolution algorithm by a pitch adjustment operation and then a harmony algorithm was used to improve the global convergence. An enhanced adaptive DE algorithm that considers SP constraint handling technique was also developed in [12] to determine the near-optimal solution of the OPF problem. The performance of the algorithm was enhanced using four operators: crossover rate (Cr) sorting mechanism, re-randomizing Cr and scale factor (F), dynamic population reduction strategy, and SP constraint linear technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential evolution (DE) [36], proposed by Storn and Price in 1995, is an efficient population-based method. Over the past two decades, due to its simplicity and effectiveness, DE has been widely used in various areas, such as multimodal optimization [37], multiobjective optimization [38], solar cell optimization [39], and dynamic optimization [40], optimal power flow [41]. Also, to enhance the performance of DE, several advanced DE variants have been developed to solve the problems in various areas [42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%