2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study assessed the effect of an optimal PEEP strategy using esophageal manometry (PEEP set to an endexpiratory transpulmonary pressure of 0-3 cm H 2 O) compared to setting the standard PEEP to 10 cmH 2 O, throughout the duration of VV ECMO support. Though the driving pressure was similar between two groups, the optimal PEEP group had reduced rates of hemodynamically signi cant RV dysfunction (4.5% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.0001) and higher rates of survival to liberation from ECMO support (72.7% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.022) [14]. Our systematic search did not identify any studies investigating the effect of prone positioning on RV biomechanics in patients with evidence of RV injury during VV ECMO support.…”
Section: Non-pharmacological Interventions Invasive Ventilation Strat...mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One study assessed the effect of an optimal PEEP strategy using esophageal manometry (PEEP set to an endexpiratory transpulmonary pressure of 0-3 cm H 2 O) compared to setting the standard PEEP to 10 cmH 2 O, throughout the duration of VV ECMO support. Though the driving pressure was similar between two groups, the optimal PEEP group had reduced rates of hemodynamically signi cant RV dysfunction (4.5% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.0001) and higher rates of survival to liberation from ECMO support (72.7% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.022) [14]. Our systematic search did not identify any studies investigating the effect of prone positioning on RV biomechanics in patients with evidence of RV injury during VV ECMO support.…”
Section: Non-pharmacological Interventions Invasive Ventilation Strat...mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Thirteen studies (43.3%) reported on RV injury management strategies [11, 13-18, 30-33, 36, 37] but only four studies (12.9%) reported on the effect of interventions on hemodynamics and indices of RV biomechanics [14,16,31,36]. Interventions identi ed included: VP ECMO (single-site dual lumen or dual-site single lumen cannulation), or mode conversion from VV to VP ECMO), veno-arterial (VA) ECMO, inodilator agents (milrinone and dobutamine), pulmonary vasodilators, ultra-lung-protective ventilation targeting a driving pressure level of 10 cmH 2 O, and optimization of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) using esophageal manometry.…”
Section: Rv Injury Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation