Abstract:This paper studies the feasibility of using synchronous reluctance machines (SynRM) for low speed-high torque applications. The challenge lies in obtaining low torque ripple values, high power factor, and, especially, high torque density values, comparable to those of permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs), but without resorting to use permanent magnets. A design and calculation procedure based on multistatic finite element analysis is developed and experimentally validated via a 200 Nm, 160 rpm prototy… Show more
“…The rotor of the reference SynRM was optimized with its stator in [22] to obtain an improved performance. A rotor with 4-poles is selected as it has been proved in [24] that a 4-poles rotor shows a better performance. Consequently, 20, 40 and 60 slots are the possible number of slots of the 5-phase stator which achieve the constrains of (2) and Table I.…”
Section: 3 and 5 ≤ 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unfortunately, a simple and balanced 5phase winding might not be possible from the existing 3phase stator. This is because, most of the existing 3-phase stators were manufactured to give an integer number of slots per pole per phase with 3-phase winding (18,24,36 or 48slots and 2, 4 or 6-poles) [15]. Consequently, a fractional number of slots per pole per phase will be obtained when applying a 5-phase winding to these stators.…”
This paper investigates the performance of 3-phase synchronous reluctance machines (SynRMs) when upgrading their stator to 5-phase, keeping the same rotor. The design of the 5-phase stator has been optimized to select the optimal dimensions of the slots and teeth. Moreover, a combined starpentagon winding is employed to further improve the machine performance. Different winding configurations have been studied and compared using 2D Ansys Maxwell transient simulations. It is observed that at optimal current angle and rated current, the average torque is increased by 17.41% when changing the 3-phase stator with the proposed 5-phase one. In addition, the efficiency of the 5-phase SynRM is increased by about 0.8% compared to 3-phase SynRM. At 3 times the rated speed, the torque and efficiency are significantly increased by around 33% and 3.5% respectively. Moreover, the 5-phase SynRM shows a superior performance in the faulty case with one phase opened. It works at 98.84% of the rated torque of the healthy 3-phase machine, whereas the 3-phase machine works at only 43.35% with huge torque ripple (228%). Finally, an experimental validation using the reference 3-phase machine has been done.
“…The rotor of the reference SynRM was optimized with its stator in [22] to obtain an improved performance. A rotor with 4-poles is selected as it has been proved in [24] that a 4-poles rotor shows a better performance. Consequently, 20, 40 and 60 slots are the possible number of slots of the 5-phase stator which achieve the constrains of (2) and Table I.…”
Section: 3 and 5 ≤ 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unfortunately, a simple and balanced 5phase winding might not be possible from the existing 3phase stator. This is because, most of the existing 3-phase stators were manufactured to give an integer number of slots per pole per phase with 3-phase winding (18,24,36 or 48slots and 2, 4 or 6-poles) [15]. Consequently, a fractional number of slots per pole per phase will be obtained when applying a 5-phase winding to these stators.…”
This paper investigates the performance of 3-phase synchronous reluctance machines (SynRMs) when upgrading their stator to 5-phase, keeping the same rotor. The design of the 5-phase stator has been optimized to select the optimal dimensions of the slots and teeth. Moreover, a combined starpentagon winding is employed to further improve the machine performance. Different winding configurations have been studied and compared using 2D Ansys Maxwell transient simulations. It is observed that at optimal current angle and rated current, the average torque is increased by 17.41% when changing the 3-phase stator with the proposed 5-phase one. In addition, the efficiency of the 5-phase SynRM is increased by about 0.8% compared to 3-phase SynRM. At 3 times the rated speed, the torque and efficiency are significantly increased by around 33% and 3.5% respectively. Moreover, the 5-phase SynRM shows a superior performance in the faulty case with one phase opened. It works at 98.84% of the rated torque of the healthy 3-phase machine, whereas the 3-phase machine works at only 43.35% with huge torque ripple (228%). Finally, an experimental validation using the reference 3-phase machine has been done.
“…By use of some optimal design methods, 1,2 the synchronous reluctance motors (SynRMs) have high power factor, high efficiency and low torque ripple compared with the induction motors (IMs). The SynRMs have been diffusely applied in the moving fluids and the textile industry, such as water well pumps and fiber spinning machines.…”
To cut down influence of nonlinear time-varying uncertainty action in a synchronous reluctance motor driving continuously variable transmission system, an admixed recurrent Gegenbauer polynomials neural network with mended particle swarm optimization control system is posed for improving control performance. The admixed recurrent Gegenbauer polynomials neural network with mended particle swarm optimization control system involves an observer control, a recurrent Gegenbauer polynomial neural network control and a remunerated control. The weights of recurrent Gegenbauer polynomials neural network controller are regulated by using the adaptive law and the gradient descent technology. The remunerated control with a reckoned law is derived and computed by means of the Lyapunov stability theorem so as to pledge stability of the control system. Likewise, to speedup convergence of weights in the recurrent Gegenbauer polynomial neural network, the mended particle swarm optimization algorithm is used for regulating two kinds of learning rates. At last, three kinds of experimental results are demonstrated to confirm the usefulness of the put forward control system with comparative studies.
“…Low-speed permanent magnet (PM) machines have attracted increasing attention in several fields, such as wind power generation, electric vehicles, electric vessels, home appliances, etc. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. They can offer so-called direct-drive operation, which is beneficial for avoiding disturbances caused by a gearbox [7].…”
In this paper, finite element analysis demonstrates the difference between dual-permanent-magnet-excited machines (DPMM) and surface-mounted permanent magnet machines (SPM) in terms of tangential force at the same air gap, diameter, stacking length, and input current. Different from most conventional machines, a novel DPMM has two sets of permanent magnets employed on both stator and rotor. To make a fair comparison, the novel DPMM, based on an original design, is specified to have the same dimensions as a conventional SPM. With the aid of 2D finite element analysis, tangential force generated from the novel DPMM is 167.65% higher than the conventional SPM. To verify the validity of the analyses, a prototype was fabricated and tested. Experiments showed that average deviation was only approximately 1.85%.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.