2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00103-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal polarized observables for model-independent new-physics search at e+e− colliders

Abstract: For the processes e + e − → µ + µ − , τ + τ − , bb and cc at a future e + e − collider with √ s = 0.5TeV, we examine the sensitivity of the helicity cross sections to four-fermion contact interactions. If longitudinal polarization of the electron beam were available, two polarized integrated cross sections would offer the opportunity to separate the helicity cross sections and, in this way, to derive model-independent bounds on the relevant parameters. The measurement of these polarized cross sections with opt… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, in this regard, one could compare the sensitivities shown in Table 1 (and Figs. 1-3) with the model-independent constraints on the parameters αβ previously obtained using a set of polarized cross sections integrated in 'optimal' angular ranges as basic experimental observables [9][10][11]. One finds that, with few exceptions relevant to specific cases in the bb and cc sectors, although defining a somewhat more involved procedure the latter observables produce more stringent constraints compared to the simpler (and more practical) observables used here (mostly asymmetries).…”
Section: Numerical Analysis and Constraints On CI Couplingsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Actually, in this regard, one could compare the sensitivities shown in Table 1 (and Figs. 1-3) with the model-independent constraints on the parameters αβ previously obtained using a set of polarized cross sections integrated in 'optimal' angular ranges as basic experimental observables [9][10][11]. One finds that, with few exceptions relevant to specific cases in the bb and cc sectors, although defining a somewhat more involved procedure the latter observables produce more stringent constraints compared to the simpler (and more practical) observables used here (mostly asymmetries).…”
Section: Numerical Analysis and Constraints On CI Couplingsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…To this aim, in the case of the process (1) at the LC considered here, a possibility is offered by initial beam polarization, that enables us to extract from the data the individual helicity cross sections through the definition of particular, and optimal, polarized integrated cross sections and, consequently, to disentangle the constraints on the corresponding CI constants [8][9][10][11]. In this article, we wish to to present a model-independent analysis of the CI that complements that of Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, we extend the analysis of Ref. [4] and discuss the case where also positron beam longitudinal polarization is available at the LC with the same c.m. energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…with σ LR and σ RL obtained from σ LL and σ RR , respectively, replacing σ + by σ − . Actually, for the purpose of optimizing the resulting bounds on Λ αβ , one can more generally define the polarized cross sections integrated over the a priori arbitrary kinematical ranges (−1, z * ) and (z * , 1) [4]:…”
Section: Separation Of the Helicity Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation