2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal platelet inhibition in patients undergoing PCI: Data from the Multicenter Registry of High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Adequate Platelet Inhibition (MR PCI) study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A flow chart depicting the timing of PFA testing with adjustments in therapy outlines our proposed practice with the addition of prasugrel (Figure 6). Until prospective validation of these approaches in RCTs, as with all medical practice, we will need to base treatment decisions on the applicable main and subgroup results of trials without individualized PFA evaluations 71. Potent new agents like prasugrel may obviate the need for platelet function assays to assess efficacy but may still be beneficial to predict safety.…”
Section: Alternative Regimens To Consider In Diabeticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A flow chart depicting the timing of PFA testing with adjustments in therapy outlines our proposed practice with the addition of prasugrel (Figure 6). Until prospective validation of these approaches in RCTs, as with all medical practice, we will need to base treatment decisions on the applicable main and subgroup results of trials without individualized PFA evaluations 71. Potent new agents like prasugrel may obviate the need for platelet function assays to assess efficacy but may still be beneficial to predict safety.…”
Section: Alternative Regimens To Consider In Diabeticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies mentioned ‘random’, but the method of randomization sequence generation was stated explicitly in five trials, of which three studies used computer generated random numbers, block randomization, random number table, respectively, two studies randomized the patients according to the order of enrollment or the date of admission. No studies mentioned specifically allocation concealment scheme except for one study referred to envelope hidden. Five studies reported blinding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No studies mentioned specifically allocation concealment scheme except for one study referred to envelope hidden. Five studies reported blinding. All included studies were successfully reported the details of participants who withdrew or were lost to follow‐up.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations