Optimal planning of multi‐day invasive species surveillance campaigns

Abstract

1. Multi-day survey campaigns are critical for timely detection of biological invasions. We propose a new modelling approach that helps allocate survey inspections in a multi-day campaign aimed at detecting the presence of an invasive organism. 2. We adopt a team orienteering problem to plan daily inspections and use an acceptance sampling approach to find an optimal surveillance strategy for emerald ash borer in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. The manager's problem is to select daily routes and determine the optimal number of host trees to inspect with a particular inspection method in each survey location, subject to upper bounds on the survey budget, daily inspection time, and total survey time span. 3. We compare optimal survey strategies computed with two different management objectives. The first problem minimizes the expected number of survey sites (or area) with undetected infestations. The second problem minimizes slippage-the expected number of undetected infested trees in sites that were not surveyed or where the surveys did not find infestation. 4. We also explore the impact of uncertainty about site infestation rates and detection probabilities on the surveillance strategy. Accounting for uncertainty helps address temporal and spatial variation in infestation rates and yields a more robust surveillance strategy. The approach is generalizable and can support delimiting survey programs for biological invasions at various spatial scales. K E Y W O R D S biological invasions, emerald ash borer, multi-day survey campaigns, optimal routing, optimization, pest detection, surveys and sampling 1 INTRODUCTION Delimiting surveys are among the most common tools used to monitor biological invasions, but they require costly and coordinated efforts over extended periods of time (

Optimal allocation of resources among general and species‐specific tools for plant pest biosecurity surveillance

“…While early efforts to identify optimal surveillance strategies relied on several simplifying assumptions to keep the problem tractable, recent work has been able to account for more realistic complexities that make this work more applicable. These complexities have included accounting for uncertainty in underlying biological parameters (Horie et al, 2013), accounting for spatial variation in detection costs (Moore & McCarthy, 2016), and accounting for travel routes to surveillance locations (Yemshanov et al, 2020). Only a few studies have attempted to optimize surveillance programs that focus on the detection of multiple species (Epanchin‐Niell et al, 2014; Jarrad et al, 2011).…”

Forest Insect Biosecurity: Processes, Patterns, Predictions, Pitfalls

“…The efficient allocation of resources for postborder biosecurity improves the success of detection (42,43,81). Strategies include tailoring trapping efforts according to identified high-risk pathways (e.g., 120,121) and optimizing sampling efforts among surveillance locations (e.g., 14,156). Balancing expenditure between surveillance and eradication is crucial for cost-efficient postborder biosecurity (16).…”