2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2318220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Placement in a Limit Order Book

Abstract: This paper proposes and studies an optimal placement problem in a limit order book. Two simple models are proposed: one with price impact and one without price impact. For the first model, optimal placement strategies for both single-period and multi-period cases are derived. For the second model, it is shown that the optimal strategy never mixes market orders and (best) limit orders; in particular, with special choices of parameters, the optimal strategy reduces to the VWAP type of Bertsimas and Lo (1998) for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blanchet and Chen (2013) derived a continuous-time model for the joint evolution of the mid price and the bid-ask spread. Several papers such as Guo et al (2013), Cont and Kukanov (2013), and Maglaras et al (2015) have been working on optimizing trading decisions in the context of a queueing model for the limit order book. More specifically, Guo et al (2013) proposed a model to optimally place orders, given price impact.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Blanchet and Chen (2013) derived a continuous-time model for the joint evolution of the mid price and the bid-ask spread. Several papers such as Guo et al (2013), Cont and Kukanov (2013), and Maglaras et al (2015) have been working on optimizing trading decisions in the context of a queueing model for the limit order book. More specifically, Guo et al (2013) proposed a model to optimally place orders, given price impact.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers such as Guo et al (2013), Cont and Kukanov (2013), and Maglaras et al (2015) have been working on optimizing trading decisions in the context of a queueing model for the limit order book. More specifically, Guo et al (2013) proposed a model to optimally place orders, given price impact. Cont and Kukanov (2013) From the empirical front, there is a significant body of literature conducting empirical analyses of the dynamics of limit order books in major exchanges.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter, on the other hand, could be viewed as the former when the execution risk is removed, as shown by Guo et al [34].…”
Section: Optimal Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guo et al [34] propose a correlated random walk model for the optimal placement problem. Their starting point is the characteristics of the LOB rather than the whole LOB and they focus on modeling the ask price.…”
Section: Correlated Random Walkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach has been to model the process through which an order is filled as a dynamic random process (Cont 2011, Cont and leading to a formulation of the optimal execution problem as a stochastic control problem. This formulation has been studied in various settings with limit orders (Bayraktar andLudkovski 2011, Gueant andLehalle 2015) or limit and market orders (Guilbaud and Pham 2013, Huitema 2012, Guo et al 2013, Li 2013) but its complexity makes it computationally intractable unless restrictive assumptions are made on price and order book dynamics. For example, these studies commonly assume that a trader places a single limit order for one unit at a time and its execution probability is given by a simplified function of distance to best quotes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%