The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2019.100892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal placement and sizing of battery energy storage system for losses reduction using whale optimization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8 represents the generic distribution system that was employed in this study. The nominal voltage of the distribution system was 11 kV with the load and branch data adapted from [18]. In total, there were 48 buses in the system with a total active and reactive load of 3.83 MW and 1.35 MVAr, correspondingly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 represents the generic distribution system that was employed in this study. The nominal voltage of the distribution system was 11 kV with the load and branch data adapted from [18]. In total, there were 48 buses in the system with a total active and reactive load of 3.83 MW and 1.35 MVAr, correspondingly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies demonstrated that the BESS should be located close to the photovoltaic distributed generation (PVDG) to best mitigate voltage fluctuation. On the other hand, optimal placement and sizing of the BESS were determined using whale optimization algorithm (WOA) to minimise total system losses [18]. Based on case studies with different numbers of photovoltaic (PV) and BESS in the distribution system, it was concluded that the BESS should be placed close to a heavy load for effective total losses reduction.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WOA was compared to other meta-heuristic algorithms, such as PSO and BFOA, and was tested on the IEEE 34-and 85-bus system. Wong et al [99] investigated the impacts of optimal integration of BESS and PV-DG units in various scenarios. The WOA was applied to a 25-bus meshed network to minimize total real power loss and was compared to PSO and FA.…”
Section: B Swarm-based Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research works [12]- [14] have studied one or more of these objectives in different variations but not all of the objectives. • A novel approach for optimal distribution network planning is introduced, where PV-DG and BESS units are integrated simultaneously by injecting real power from the PV modules and the BESS units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• A novel approach for optimal distribution network planning is introduced, where PV-DG and BESS units are integrated simultaneously by injecting real power from the PV modules and the BESS units. The proposed approach enables a seamless interactive mechanism between DG allocation and BESS allocation, unlike in [12], [13] where PV is either fixed or initially integrated based on physical observation before the integrating the BESS units, the approach assigns bus locations to PV-DG units at every second round of iterations. • In contrast to developing a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm that requires the whole mechanism of each algorithm to solve the optimal integration problem (as in [15]), this paper splits the problem into subproblems and assigns each algorithm according to their strengths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%