2019 Fifth International Conference on Electrical Energy Systems (ICEES) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icees.2019.8719240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Placement and Sizing of Multiple Distributed Generators using Fuzzy Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…System configuration is dependent on an operating voltage of 100 MVA, 12.66 kVA (L-L), and 60 Hz. Load and impedance data is provided at [9]. The total real and interactive power loads on the system are 3715 kW and 2300 kV.…”
Section: Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…System configuration is dependent on an operating voltage of 100 MVA, 12.66 kVA (L-L), and 60 Hz. Load and impedance data is provided at [9]. The total real and interactive power loads on the system are 3715 kW and 2300 kV.…”
Section: Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essallah et al have presented a new method for optimal planning of DGs where researchers used the Voltage -Stability Margin-Index (VSMI) method to determine the optimum location and determine the size by MATLAB -curve-fitting -approximation [8]. Magadum and Kulkarni have proposed the fuzzy logic method to determine the optimal location and size of DGs [9]. Researches [6 and 10], have proposed the genetic algorithm for the optimal planning of DGs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from technology selection, prudent DG planning in size and locations is also important in fulfilling the above potential applications. Although capability of generating active and reactive power vary across different DG techniques, a small amount sizing of DG can also enhance power supply efficiency on the order of 10% to 20% power loss reduction through distribution by placing in appropriate locations 48,69‐72 . However, inappropriate installation of DGs may result in under‐ or over‐voltage issues and enlarge mismatches between reactive power demand against system reactive power supply ability, while inadequate DG sizes could not fulfil their potentials and redundant allocation may result in huge investment costs.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although capability of generating active and reactive power vary across different DG techniques, a small amount sizing of DG can also enhance power supply efficiency on the order of 10% to 20% power loss reduction through distribution by placing in appropriate locations. 48,[69][70][71][72] However, inappropriate installation of DGs may result in under-or over-voltage issues and enlarge mismatches between reactive power demand against system reactive power supply ability, while inadequate DG sizes could not fulfil their potentials and redundant allocation may result in huge investment costs. Clearly, decisions of DG technology types, locations, and sizes are highly coupled, yielding a considerate number of feasible solutions, which are distributed in a highdimensional and non-convex domain due to complexity caused by network topology, power flow, power system operation, and so on.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various research works have given different techniques to have better DG placement and sizing. Magadum and Kulkarni [6] address the issue of multiple DG placement and sizing with the goal of minimizing power loss while staying within a safe voltage range. The solution for the DG placement uses fuzzy logic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%