2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2023.105621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal physical human–robot collaborative controller with user-centric tuning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Energy-based control methods have also been proposed to enable safe human-robot interaction by adapting position trajectory references in correlation with set maximum values of the position-based controller [184,185]. Other variable impedance control frameworks can be found in [186][187][188][189][190], where preference-based optimization has also been exploited to customize the robot controller on the basis of the user's feedback [191]. Vanderborght et al provided an extensive overview of variable impedance actuators (VIAs), classifying actuators based on the implementation of variable stiffness and damping [192].…”
Section: Post-collision Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy-based control methods have also been proposed to enable safe human-robot interaction by adapting position trajectory references in correlation with set maximum values of the position-based controller [184,185]. Other variable impedance control frameworks can be found in [186][187][188][189][190], where preference-based optimization has also been exploited to customize the robot controller on the basis of the user's feedback [191]. Vanderborght et al provided an extensive overview of variable impedance actuators (VIAs), classifying actuators based on the implementation of variable stiffness and damping [192].…”
Section: Post-collision Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%