2008 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications 2008
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2007.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Peer-to-Peer Technique for Massive Content Distribution

Abstract: Abstract-A distinct trend has emerged that the Internet is used to transport data on a more and more massive scale. Capacity shortage in the backbone networks has become a genuine possibility, which will be more serious with fiber-based access. The problem addressed in this paper is how to conduct massive content distribution efficiently in the future network environment where the capacity limitation can equally be at the core or the edge. We propose a novel peer-to-peer technique as a main content transport m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea is to use the L multicast trees simultaneously with the correct tree rates. In the modified algorithm, every source computes the time average of the virtual source rates (for releasing virtual packets to the network) that each of its L trees sees; this yields the time averages of the virtual tree rates and these time-average rates converge to the optimal tree rates regardless of the buffer size 7 .…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea is to use the L multicast trees simultaneously with the correct tree rates. In the modified algorithm, every source computes the time average of the virtual source rates (for releasing virtual packets to the network) that each of its L trees sees; this yields the time averages of the virtual tree rates and these time-average rates converge to the optimal tree rates regardless of the buffer size 7 .…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way, the real rates will not overshoot too much. Note that the adaptation of the real rates and the computation of the time averages are done concurrently; there is no 7 Here, the optimal rate-allocation problem is a modified one. Compared with the original optimization problem, the only modification is that it assumes L fixed trees per multicast session.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along this line, several solutions based on a tree have been proposed in the literature [4,7,8,21]. Some of them define a multicast tree that aims at optimizing the bandwidth use [4,7,22]. Others also deal with scalability by limiting the knowledge each process has about the system [8,21]; yet other systems aim at increasing robustness with respect to packet loss [23][24][25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar problem was addressed in [7] in the context of separate swarming. The rate-allocation problem in universal swarming is substantially more difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%