2014 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/smartgridcomm.2014.7007714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal payment sharing mechanism for renewable energy aggregation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An extension of the PAM in [10] is proposed in [12], where statistical information of the RPPs is used to find the optimal forward power contract of the aggregator (similar to prior studies in the "ex-ante" settings [13]). The PAM of [10] is used as the base case, and the difference between the total payoff of the aggregation when it uses the optimal forward contract vs. when it uses the sum of RPPs' power contracts is distributed among the RPPs.…”
Section: Related Work On Payoff Allocation To Achieve Ex-post Promentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An extension of the PAM in [10] is proposed in [12], where statistical information of the RPPs is used to find the optimal forward power contract of the aggregator (similar to prior studies in the "ex-ante" settings [13]). The PAM of [10] is used as the base case, and the difference between the total payoff of the aggregation when it uses the optimal forward contract vs. when it uses the sum of RPPs' power contracts is distributed among the RPPs.…”
Section: Related Work On Payoff Allocation To Achieve Ex-post Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we employ the following model (cf. [10], [11], [12]) for aggregating RPPs: a. Each RPP i submits a DA commitment c i pě 0q to the aggregator.…”
Section: B Aggregation Of Rpps and Payoff Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APPENDIX C PROOF OF THEOREM 2 From Theorem 1, if a pure NE exists, it must take the form of (14). In this proof, we show that 1) If condition (15) holds, then (14) is indeed a pure NE, and 2) If condition (15) does not hold, then there exists a set of DA and RT prices such that a pure NE does not exist. Part 1): Suppose condition (15) holds.…”
Section: Appendix B Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…To this end, a simple interface between aggregator and RPPs has been proposed in [13]: each RPP submits just a single number to the aggregator, and the aggregator simply passes on the sum of these numbers as the forward power contract for the entire aggregation. Based on this simple interface, the central design task is again on the payoff allocation among the RPPs, for which a number of payoff allocation mechanisms (PAMs) have been proposed [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. Under any given PAM, the RPPs' strategic decision making entails a non-cooperative game (as will be described later in Section II-E), and properties of the Nash Equilibria of this game have been studied in [13], [14], [15], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach provides results on the existence of Nash equilibria for the contract game defined by this payment sharing mechanism, however it does not optimize the payoff of the aggregate. In [8], a payment sharing mechanism is proposed in which the payments are based on the production of individual suppliers, and it optimizes the payoff for the aggregate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%